Lis pendens and measures of inquiry: some reflections on the ECJ judgment of 4 may 2017
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20318/cdt.2018.4144Keywords:
lis pendens, concept of document instituting the proceedings or equivalent document, proceedings for the taking of evidenceAbstract
In its Judgment of 4 may 2017, in case C-29/16, Hanse Yachts AG c. Port D’Hiver Yachting SARL, Société Maritime Côte D’Azur y Compagnie Generali IARD SA, the ECJ establishes that a document instituting proceedings for the taking of evidence cannot be regarded, for the purposes of assessing a situation of lis pendens and of determining which court is the court first seised within the meaning of articles 27 and 30 of Regulation (EC) nº 44/2001, as also being the document instituting the substantive proceedings.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2018-03-08
Issue
Section
Varia
License
Se permite que los autores de los trabajos de investigación publicados en la Revista los reproduzcan en otros sitios siempre que se haga mención de que han sido previamente publicados en Cuadernos de Derecho Transnacional (CDT).How to Cite
Lis pendens and measures of inquiry: some reflections on the ECJ judgment of 4 may 2017. (2018). CUADERNOS DE DERECHO TRANSNACIONAL, 10(1), 630-638. https://doi.org/10.20318/cdt.2018.4144