Prestige and European arbitration

about the Judgment London Steam-Ship of the CJEU (case C-700/20)

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20318/cdt.2022.7222

Keywords:

European arbitration, Regulation Brussels I recast, Arbitration clause, Arbitral award, Irreconcilable judgment, Lis pendens, Public policy

Abstract

The judgment of the CJEU accepts that, in principle, a judgment entered in terms of the award may constitute a judicial decision for the purposes of the application of Article 45.1 c/ of the Brussels I Regulation recast. However, in order to be able to effectively attain such status, the judgment must necessarily meets a series of requirements. These requirements must be appreciated in a sort of test of equivalence with respect to a “genuinely European” decision and are specified in what the CJEU has described as “two fundamental rules” of the Regulation: the relative effect of the arbitration clause and lis pendens.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2022-09-30

Issue

Vol. 14 No. 2 (2022)

Section

Varia

License

Se permite que los autores de los trabajos de investigación publicados en la Revista los reproduzcan en otros sitios siempre que se haga mención de que han sido previamente publicados en Cuadernos de Derecho Transnacional (CDT).

How to Cite

Prestige and European arbitration: about the Judgment London Steam-Ship of the CJEU (case C-700/20). (2022). CUADERNOS DE DERECHO TRANSNACIONAL, 14(2), 1088-1099. https://doi.org/10.20318/cdt.2022.7222