The parties bound by the forum selection clause. Commentary to the ECJ judgment of 28 june 2017, Leventis y Vafeias, c. 436/16
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20318/cdt.2018.4136Keywords:
jurisdiction clause, third parties effectsAbstract
This Judgment refers to whether a jurisdiction clause in a contract between two companies can be relied upon by the representatives of one of them to dispute the jurisdiction of a court over an action for damages which aims to render them jointly and severally liable for supposedly tortious acts carried out in the performance of their duties. The conclusion of the ECJ is that a jurisdiction clause may, in principle, produce effects only in the relations between the parties who have given their agreement to the conclusion of the contract.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2018-03-08
Issue
Section
Varia
License
Se permite que los autores de los trabajos de investigación publicados en la Revista los reproduzcan en otros sitios siempre que se haga mención de que han sido previamente publicados en Cuadernos de Derecho Transnacional (CDT).How to Cite
The parties bound by the forum selection clause. Commentary to the ECJ judgment of 28 june 2017, Leventis y Vafeias, c. 436/16. (2018). CUADERNOS DE DERECHO TRANSNACIONAL, 10(1), 551-560. https://doi.org/10.20318/cdt.2018.4136