Comentario a la sentencia del Tribunal de Justicia de la Unión Europea (Gran Sala), de 26 de marzo de 2019, sobre la abusividad de determinadas clausulas de vencimiento anticipado de préstamos hipotecarios (de Modestino a Bauman, o del “derecho sólido” al “derecho líquido”)

Juan María Díaz Fraile

doi:10.20318/cdt.2019.4976

Commentary on the judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union March 26, 2019, regarding the abusivity of certain clauses of advanced expiration of mortgage loans (from Modestino to Bauman, or from “solid law” to “liquid law”)

Authors

Juan María Díaz Fraile University of Salamanca http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3112-0112 (unauthenticated)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20318/cdt.2019.4976

Keywords:

mortgage loan, foreclosure, clauses of advanced expiration of mortgage loans

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to analyze the judgment of the CJEU of 26 of March of 2019. In this case, the CJEU ruled about the abusity of certaun clauses of advanced expiration of mortgage loans.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

PDF (Spanish)

Published

2019-10-01

Issue

Vol. 11 No. 2 (2019)

Section

Varia

License

Se permite que los autores de los trabajos de investigación publicados en la Revista los reproduzcan en otros sitios siempre que se haga mención de que han sido previamente publicados en Cuadernos de Derecho Transnacional (CDT).

How to Cite

Commentary on the judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union March 26, 2019, regarding the abusivity of certain clauses of advanced expiration of mortgage loans (from Modestino to Bauman, or from “solid law” to “liquid law”). (2019). CUADERNOS DE DERECHO TRANSNACIONAL, 11(2), 520-574. https://doi.org/10.20318/cdt.2019.4976

Download Citation