Can harmonized time limits in European civil procedure enhance the effectiveness of the enforcement of EU Law?

Authors

  • Giovanni Chiapponi , Max Planck Institute Luxembourg for International, ,

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20318/cdt.2020.5202

Keywords:

Time limits, provisional measures, recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and com-mercial matters, civil judicial cooperation, harmonisation

Abstract

The article focuses on the judgment Al Bosco, rendered by the ECJ on 4th October 2018. Al Bosco gives a new insight as to how the ECJ interprets the following questions: firstly, it clarifies the relationship between the doctrine of extended effects and that of equivalent effects; secondly, it underlines the importance of the principle of legal certainty; finally, it addresses issues concerning the time limit for the enforcement of a provisional measure issued in a Member State other than the Member State in which enforcement is sought. Against such a background, I will examine the pos-sibility of introducing a uniform and autonomous concept of harmonized time limits within the EU.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2020-03-05
Metrics
Views/Downloads
  • Abstract
    504
  • PDF
    475
Further information

Issue

Vol. 12 No. 1 (2020)

Section

Varia

License

Se permite que los autores de los trabajos de investigación publicados en la Revista los reproduzcan en otros sitios siempre que se haga mención de que han sido previamente publicados en Cuadernos de Derecho Transnacional (CDT).

Los documentos incluyen  la licencia Creative Commons 4.0: Atribución–No Comercial–Sin Obra Derivada (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

How to Cite

Can harmonized time limits in European civil procedure enhance the effectiveness of the enforcement of EU Law?. (2020). CUADERNOS DE DERECHO TRANSNACIONAL, 12(1), 543-549. https://doi.org/10.20318/cdt.2020.5202