Peculiarities about judicial authority in case of international child abduction for the purpose of council Regulation (EC) 2201/2003
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20318/cdt.2020.5611Keywords:
transnational litigation, international child abduction, habitual residence, the best interest of the childAbstract
Most of the set of international child abduction cases are a tragic and painful manifestation of a marriage or couple crisis. In this framework, cross-border withholding, in the face of strictly internal situations, has as its distinctive element the displacement or transfer of the minor in charge of the abducer in order to find a different legal system of coverage that is more favorable to his interests. To avoid multiple damages and in order to preserve the best interests of the minor, Council Regulation (EC) 2201/2003 shields competition in this matter in favor of the courts of the minor’s habitual residence. Although, the great diversity of causes underlying child abduction should not be ignored when proposing the most appropriate solution.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Se permite que los autores de los trabajos de investigación publicados en la Revista los reproduzcan en otros sitios siempre que se haga mención de que han sido previamente publicados en Cuadernos de Derecho Transnacional (CDT).
Los documentos incluyen la licencia Creative Commons 4.0: Atribución–No Comercial–Sin Obra Derivada (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).