Bondora: another brick in the proceduralization of the consumers’ substantive rights

Authors

  • Carlos Santaló Goris Max Planck Institute Luxembourg , Max Planck Institute Luxembourg

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20318/cdt.2020.5667

Keywords:

European civil procedure, European Payment Order, CJEU judgement, consu¬mers’ protection, unfairness of the contractual terms

Abstract

Last December 2019, the Court of Justice of the European Union (“CJEU”) rendered the judgment Bondora (Joined Cases C‑453/18 and C‑494/18). In this case, the CJEU explored whether it is possible to carry out an ex officio review of the fairness of the contractual terms in the European Payment Order (“EPO”). Whereas the CJEU had already addressed similar preliminary references in the context of the domestic payment orders, for the first this issue is addressed in an European uniform proceeding. This case note aims at analysing the Bondora judgement as well as the impact the judgment had on the functioning and the structure of the EPO proceeding.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2020-10-08

Issue

Section

Varia

How to Cite

Bondora: another brick in the proceduralization of the consumers’ substantive rights. (2020). CUADERNOS DE DERECHO TRANSNACIONAL, 12(2), 1187-1198. https://doi.org/10.20318/cdt.2020.5667