Bondora: another brick in the proceduralization of the consumers’ substantive rights
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20318/cdt.2020.5667Keywords:
European civil procedure, European Payment Order, CJEU judgement, consu¬mers’ protection, unfairness of the contractual termsAbstract
Last December 2019, the Court of Justice of the European Union (“CJEU”) rendered the judgment Bondora (Joined Cases C‑453/18 and C‑494/18). In this case, the CJEU explored whether it is possible to carry out an ex officio review of the fairness of the contractual terms in the European Payment Order (“EPO”). Whereas the CJEU had already addressed similar preliminary references in the context of the domestic payment orders, for the first this issue is addressed in an European uniform proceeding. This case note aims at analysing the Bondora judgement as well as the impact the judgment had on the functioning and the structure of the EPO proceeding.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Se permite que los autores de los trabajos de investigación publicados en la Revista los reproduzcan en otros sitios siempre que se haga mención de que han sido previamente publicados en Cuadernos de Derecho Transnacional (CDT).
Los documentos incluyen la licencia Creative Commons 4.0: Atribución–No Comercial–Sin Obra Derivada (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).