Jurisdiction to rule on an application opposing enforcement of a foreign maintenance decision: purpose to the CJEU Judgement of 4th June 2020, FX C. Gz, C-41/19
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20318/cdt.2021.5990Keywords:
Regulation 4/2009, jurisdiction, application opposing enforcement, maintenance obligation, discharge of the debtAbstract
The CJEU Judgement of 4th June 2020, FX c. GZ, C-41/19, resolves the question of
whether the application opposing enforcement of a foreign maintenance decision by the debtor of said maintenance obligation, is within the scope of Regulation 4/2009. Well, first of all, the CJEU has to decide whether it is a matter that falls under chapter II of Regulation 4/2009, which regulates jurisdiction; or, it is included in chapter IV, with which the rules on recognition and enforcement of decisions would be applicable to the litigation; or it is excluded from the scope of Regulation 4/2009 and Regulation 1215/2012 could be applicable.
Second, the CJEU has to resolve the jurisdiction to rule on an application opposing enforcement by the maintenance debtor, when the reason on which said of a foreign maintenance decision is based is the discharge of the debt.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
-
Abstract653
-
PDF 729
Issue
Section
License
Se permite que los autores de los trabajos de investigación publicados en la Revista los reproduzcan en otros sitios siempre que se haga mención de que han sido previamente publicados en Cuadernos de Derecho Transnacional (CDT).
Los documentos incluyen la licencia Creative Commons 4.0: Atribución–No Comercial–Sin Obra Derivada (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).