The beneficiaries of the option to resort to the jurisdiction of the creditor’s habitual residence in the maintenance obligations regulation - the reversal of jurisprudence in the judgment WV versus

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20318/cdt.2021.6019

Keywords:

maintenance Obligations Regulation, creditor’s habitual residence, Article 3 (b)

Abstract

This brief commentary analyses the judgment of the ECJ, Wv against Landkreis Ham-burg, and the controversy that was settled over the possibility of a public entity appealing to the court of the creditor’s habitual residence, according to Article 3 (b) of the Maintenance Obligations Regulation, in an action for recovery of maintenance brought against the debtor concerning the maintenance credit that was transmitted to him by legal subrogation, as a result of social assistance benefits.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2021-03-08

Issue

Vol. 13 No. 1 (2021)

Section

Varia

License

Se permite que los autores de los trabajos de investigación publicados en la Revista los reproduzcan en otros sitios siempre que se haga mención de que han sido previamente publicados en Cuadernos de Derecho Transnacional (CDT).

How to Cite

The beneficiaries of the option to resort to the jurisdiction of the creditor’s habitual residence in the maintenance obligations regulation - the reversal of jurisprudence in the judgment WV versus. (2021). CUADERNOS DE DERECHO TRANSNACIONAL, 13(1), 1106-1112. https://doi.org/10.20318/cdt.2021.6019