Negative conflict of territorial jurisdiction regarding the execution of a foreign judicial resolution from a US court
accurate selection of the applicable normative block: for the purpose of order no. 260/2020 of the Supreme Court
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20318/cdt.2022.6699Keywords:
exequatur, negative conflict of competence, applicable lawAbstract
The Order of the Supreme Court correctly resolves the negative conflict of jurisdiction raised between a court in Bilbao and another in Santoña, in relation to the request for exequatur of a judicial decision issued originally by a US court. The legal basis of the Supreme Court Order is correct when selecting the internal regulatory block (Law 20/2015, of July 30, on International Legal Cooperation in Civil Matters) as the legal channel through which to resolve such request, when proceeding the judicial decision of the courts of a third State (in this case, the US) that is not a member of the EU, nor with which there is a multilateral or bilateral agreement applicable to the case.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Se permite que los autores de los trabajos de investigación publicados en la Revista los reproduzcan en otros sitios siempre que se haga mención de que han sido previamente publicados en Cuadernos de Derecho Transnacional (CDT).
Los documentos incluyen la licencia Creative Commons 4.0: Atribución–No Comercial–Sin Obra Derivada (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).