In the return of a child transferred to a third State, the European rules of international judicial competence do not apply. Regarding the STJUE of March 24, 2021, case C-603/20, PPU, SS and MCP
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20318/cdt.2022.6710Keywords:
international child abduction, parental responsibility, international jurisdiction, habitual residence, third StateAbstract
The territorial scope of Article 10 of Regulation (EC) 2201/2003 is limited to the abduction of a minor taking place in the context of the Member States of the Regulation, that is, the transfer of habitual residence or illegal retention is carried out between Member States. In the case where the transfer is made to a third State, Article 10 does not apply and, consequently, does it allow to maintain the competence of the authorities of the Member State where the minor resided sine die.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2022-03-04
Issue
Section
Varia
License
Se permite que los autores de los trabajos de investigación publicados en la Revista los reproduzcan en otros sitios siempre que se haga mención de que han sido previamente publicados en Cuadernos de Derecho Transnacional (CDT).How to Cite
In the return of a child transferred to a third State, the European rules of international judicial competence do not apply. Regarding the STJUE of March 24, 2021, case C-603/20, PPU, SS and MCP. (2022). CUADERNOS DE DERECHO TRANSNACIONAL, 14(1), 727-735. https://doi.org/10.20318/cdt.2022.6710