The judgment in the Intel case or how Competition law does not respond to the current reality

Authors

  • Aitor Zurimendi Isla , , Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea , , ,

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20318/cdt.2022.7210

Keywords:

abuse of dominant position, burden of proof, Competition law

Abstract

The judgment of the General Court of 26.1.2022 overrides the Decision of the Commission in the Intel case and establishes a system of distribution of the burden of proof that in practice supposes a great obstacle for the Competition Authorities to stop effectively the abuse of dominant position of digital companies. This paper analyzes the sentence, the ideal model of the burden of proof system for the abuse of dominant position, and proposes its reform.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2022-09-29

Issue

Vol. 14 No. 2 (2022)

Section

Estudios

License

Se permite que los autores de los trabajos de investigación publicados en la Revista los reproduzcan en otros sitios siempre que se haga mención de que han sido previamente publicados en Cuadernos de Derecho Transnacional (CDT).

How to Cite

The judgment in the Intel case or how Competition law does not respond to the current reality. (2022). CUADERNOS DE DERECHO TRANSNACIONAL, 14(2), 900-914. https://doi.org/10.20318/cdt.2022.7210