About the Journal

Peer Review Process

Peer evaluation process. The publication of the papers will be decided by the Direction of the Journal, with the participation of the Editorial Board and being advised by the Scientific Committee, based on an external, independent and anonymous evaluation (peer 2 peer review). The paper may be "accepted", "accepted with modifications" or "rejected". Depending on the nature of the paper, it will be included in the "Studies" section or in the "Varia" section.

Plagiarism control

Cuadernos de Derecho Transnacional in order to guarantee the academic integrity of the publication uses  <<Feedback Studio>> , an application that allows reviewing documents by detecting incorrect citations or plagiarism.

Ethics and malpractice statement

1. General duties of the editorial team that make up CDT

i) The Direction and the editorial management of CDT as well as the Advisory Committee, the Scientific Committee and the Evaluation Committee undertake to be up to date with all the contents published in the journal.

ii) Strive to meet the needs of readers and authors.

iii) To commit to the constant improvement of the review.

iv) To ensure the quality of the published contents.

v) To put science and ethical commitments before economic benefits

vi) To retract, clarify, correct or apologize in relation to the content of the publications when necessary

2. Ethical commitments of the CDT editorial team with readers

i) Inform readers about who founded the review, who are the directors and are part of its editorial team.

ii) Ensure that all contents have been reviewed by experts in the field.

iii) Publish some clear, simple and concise rules for authors so that anyone can know the steps to follow to publish in the review.

iv) Commit to promoting scientific references in the works, maintaining clear guidelines for authors in this regard.

v) Show clarity regarding the ownership of published works.

3. Ethical commitments of the CDT editorial team with the authors

i) That the reasons that lead to accept, accept with modifications or reject a paper for publication only rely on scientific reasons based on the quality and originality of it.

ii) Except for serious errors in relation to the evaluation process, decisions about whether a job is accepted or denied will not be modified.

iii) The evaluation process followed to accept a work will be published on the review's website.

iv) The publication of  clear, simple and concise rules  for authors so that anyone can know the steps to follow to publish in the review.

4. Commitments of the CDT editorial team with the reviewers

i) The commitment to provide the reviewers with clear instructions on the evaluation process and on the obligations they have with the journal in relation to their review task.

ii) The commitment to require reviewers to manifest any personal interest that may cause problems of neutrality in the review process.

iii) The commitment to maintain the anonymity of the review.

Abstracting and Indexing

- ÍnDICEs-CSIC

- HeinOnline

- ERIH Plus

- MIAR 2018 (Matriz de Información para el Análisis de Revistas).

- Catálogo LATINDEX.

- Dialnet (Universidad de La Rioja)

- Category B –Law  CARHUS Plus+ 2018

Sponsors

Instituto de Justicia y Litigación "Alonso Martínez"

CDT Policy Regarding the Use of Works Using Artificial Intelligence

The Cuadernos de Derecho Transnacional Journal establishes a policy of not allowing the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in scientific publications in order to maintain the highest standards of scientific integrity. We are aware of the relevance of these tools and the impact of their use, but we will not accept works generated using these tools. This policy will be updated periodically to ensure its relevance.

Authorship policy

CDT considers an author of a published work to be someone who has made a significant intellectual contribution to it. Following the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), to be listed as an author, the following requirements must be met:

1. They must have participated in the conception and design, or in the acquisition of data, or in the analysis and interpretation of data, of the work that resulted in the article.
2. They must have participated in the writing or critical revision of the text.
3. They must have approved the version that will be finally published.

Those who do not meet these three criteria may only be acknowledged in the acknowledgments. To avoid the risk of fictitious or assumed authorship, it is recommended that, at the time of submitting the document, all authors agree on their contributions and the order in which they will appear in the list of co-authors.

To specify the contribution of each author to the work, it is recommended to use the criteria established by the CRediT taxonomy (Contributor Roles Taxonomy).