Artificial intelligence and the fundamental right to a natural judge and a fair trial

Authors

  • Mario G. Losano Accademia delle Scienze Torino
  • Encarnación La Spina University of Deusto image/svg+xml

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20318/dyl.2026.10407

Keywords:

Costitutional Court, copyright and AI, Ombudsman, executives orders and AI

Abstract

The use of generative AI is creating problems in various fields, including the legal field. Can a judge use AI to draft a ruling? If so, is the judge who signs that ruling or the person who produced the AI program that generated it liable for any errors or damages? Colombia’s Constitutional Court ruling T-323 addressed this issue. In the US, Biden and Trump’s executive orders have established rules for the use of AI.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-10
Metrics
Views/Downloads
  • Abstract
    51
  • PDF
    51

Issue

No. 55 (2026)

Section

Artículos

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Bartolomé de las Casas Human Rights Institute

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

The Gregorio Peces-Barba Human Rights Institute retains copyright of the published articles, reviews and news, and it is needed to quote the origin in any partial or total reproduction.

The documents include the Creative Commons 4.0 license: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

Derechos y Libertades does not charge any fees for receiving, processing or publishing articles submitted by authors.

How to Cite

Losano, M. G. (2026). Artificial intelligence and the fundamental right to a natural judge and a fair trial (E. La Spina, Trans.). DERECHOS Y LIBERTADES: Revista De Filosofía Del Derecho Y Derechos Humanos, 55, 137-153. https://doi.org/10.20318/dyl.2026.10407