Posthumanism is not an humanism
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20318/dyl.2021.5848Keywords:
humanism, posthumanism, dataism, dehumanization, digital society, new technologies, information and communication technology, artificial intelligence, algorithms, COVID-19Abstract
This paper aims to show the opposition between the Humanist cultural tradition and the main theses currently defended by Posthumanism. The structure of the paper is built upon the corresponding answers provided by both trends to the three main philosophical questions: How do we know reality? What are the world and life, and how are they explained? What is the best way to live one’s life? Gnoseology (or theory of knowledge), Ontology, and Deontology or Ethics have respectively tried to provide answers for such questions. Certain ambiguities of the Posthumanist dehumanizing project are also addressed. The paper concludes with an exposition of the arguments that justify the continuity of Humanist values, principles, and rights, updated according to the demands of our time.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2021-01-25
Issue
Section
Artículos
License
The Gregorio Peces-Barba Human Rights Institute retains copyright of the published articles, reviews and news, and it is needed to quote the origin in any partial or total reproduction.
The documents include the Creative Commons 4.0 license: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
Derechos y Libertades does not charge any fees for receiving, processing or publishing articles submitted by authors.
How to Cite
Posthumanism is not an humanism. (2021). DERECHOS Y LIBERTADES: Revista De Filosofía Del Derecho Y Derechos Humanos, 44, 17-40. https://doi.org/10.20318/dyl.2021.5848