Biocultural rights
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20318/eunomia.2026.10384Keywords:
Biocultural rights, Indigenous peoples, local communities, rights of nature, conservation of the environmentAbstract
Biocultural rights are the set of collective rights that indigenous peoples and local communities need to maintain –if they so wish– their custodial relationship with nature. This set of rights, necessary to enable them to have secure access to and use of their lands and waters, the possibility of conserving their cultural, linguistic and social practices, and the possibility of self-determining their local rules and institutions, has been conceived based on the interpretation of international environmental law and the jurisprudence of the Supreme Courts, as a set of rights with a dual foundation: protecting both the interests of indigenous peoples and local communities and those of nature. Therefore, they are materialized through two dimensions: as rights to the environment and as duties of protection towards the environment. This essay briefly describes the theoretical development of biocultural rights and analyses their legal foundations and the consequences of their being justified by two different sets of interests. This dual rationale will be critically analysed, paying attention to the consequences of being grounded in two sets of interest holders and drawing different conclusions for indigenous peoples –indigenous rights holders– and for local communities –who are not recognised under international law as holders of rights that are not directly related to the protection of nature or environmentally relevant practices
Downloads
References
Agrawal, A. y Gibson, C. (1999). Enchantment and Disenchantment: The Role of Community in Natural Resource Conservation. World Development, 4, 629-649. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(98)00161-2
Barrow, E. G. C. y Murphree, M. W. (2001). Community Conservation from Concept to Practice. En D. Hulme, M. Murphree (eds.), African Wildlife and Livelihoods: The Promise and Performance of Community Conservation (24-37). James Currey.
Bavikatte, S. K. (2014). Stewarding the Earth. Rethinking Property and the Emergence of Biocultural Rights. Oxford University Press.
Bavikatte, S. K., y Bennett, T. (2015). Community Stewardship: The Foundation of Biocultural Rights. Journal of Human Rights and the Environment, 6 (1), 7-29. 10.4337/jhre.2015.01.01
Bavikatte, S. K. y Robinson, D. (2011). Towards a People’s History of the Law: Biocultural Jurisprudence and the Nagoya Protocol on Access and Benefit Sharing. Law Environment and Development, 7 (1), 35-51. https://archive.abs-biotrade.info/fileadmin/media/ABS_Simply_explained/Nagoya_Protocol/NJ-BCPS.pdf
Bessa, A. y Gilbert, J. (2022). Indigenous Peoples and Traditional Local Communities in the UNDROP: Synergies and Challenges. En M. Alabrese, A. Bessa, M. Brunori, P. F. Giuggioli (eds.), The United Nations’ Declaration on Peasants’ Rights (32-47). Routledge.
Borràs, S. (2016). New Transitions from Human Rights to the Environment to the Rights of Nature. Transnational Environmental Law, 5 (1), 113-143. 10.1017/S204710251500028X
Brechin, S. R., Wilshusen, P. R., Fortwangler, C. L. y West, P. C. (2002). Beyond the Square Wheel: Toward a More Comprehensive Understanding of Biodiversity Conservation as Social and Political Process. Society and Natural Resources, 15 (1), 41-64. https://doi.org/10.1080/089419202317174011
Castillo Galvis, S. H., D’Janon Donado, M. L. y Ramírez Nárdiz, A. (2019). El control de convencionalidad y el diálogo judicial frente al medio ambiente como sujeto de protección y reparación. Revista Mexicana de Derecho Constitucionales, 41, 397-428. https://revistas.juridicas.unam.mx/index.php/cuestiones-constitucionales/article/view/13952/15205
Celano, B. (2001). I diritti nella jurisprudence anglosassone contemporanea. Da Hart a Raz. Analisi e Diritto 2001, 1-58.
Claus, A. C., Kai, C. M. A. y Satterfield, T. (2010). The Roles of People in Conservation. En Sodhi, N.S., Ehrlich, P. R. (eds), Conservation Biology for All (262-283). Oxford University Press.
Dupuy, P. M. y Viñuales, J. E. (2018). International Environmental Law. Cambridge University Press.
Ellingson, T. (2001). The Myth of the Noble Savage. University of California Press.
Fernández-Llamazares, A., Fa, J. E., Brockington, D., Brondízio, E.S., Cariño, J., Corbera, E., Farhan Ferrari, M., Kobei, D., Malmer, P., Márquez, G.Y.H., Molnár, Z., Tugendhat, H., y Garnett, S. T. (2024). No basis for claim that 80% of biodiversity is found in Indigenous territories. Nature, 633, 32-35. 10.1038/d41586-023-02809-2
García, A. y Varón, D. (2018). La sentencia del río Atrato: un paso más allá de la Constitución Verde. En Orduz Salinas, N. (ed.), La corte ambiental. Expresiones ciudadanas sobre los avances constitucionales (297-317). Heinrich Böll Stiftung.
Gavin, M. C., McCarter, J., Mead, A., Berkes, F., Stepp, J. R., Peterson, D. y Tang, R. (2015). Defining Biocultural Approaches to Conservation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 30 (3), 140-145. 10.1016/j.tree.2014.12.005
Girard, F., Hall, I. y Frison, C. (2022). Biocultural Rights, Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities. Protecting Culture and the Environment. Routledge.
Gottschalk, P. (2023). Taking Environmental Rights in the Anthropocene Seriously. The Case of Biodiversity and the Nagoya Protocol. En Walter, B. F., y May, J. R. (eds.), Environmental Human Rights in the Anthropocene. Concepts, Contexts, and Challenges (52-69). Cambridge University Press.
Griffin, J. (2008). On Human Rights. Oxford University Press.
Hardin, G. (1968). The Tragedy of the Commons. Science, 162 (3859), 1243-1248. 10.1126/science.162.3859.1243
IPBES. (2019). Summary for Policymakers of the Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services.
Jonas, H., Makagon, E. J. y Shrumm, H. (2013). The Living Convention. A Compendium of Internationally Recognised Rights that Support the Integrity and Resilience of Indigenous Peoples’ and Local Communities’ Territories and Other Social-Ecological Systems. Natural Justice.
Jonas, H. D. (2020). The Living Convention. Volume II: A Methodology for Counter-mapping and Recentering International Law. Natural Justice.
Kauffman, C. M. y Martin, P. L. (2018). When Rivers Have Rights: Case Comparison of New Zealand, Colombia, and India. Presentation given at the International Studies Association Annual Conference, San Francisco, CA.
Kotzé, L. J. (2014). Human Rights and the Environment in the Anthropocene. The Anthropocene Review, 1 (3), 252-275. 10.1177/2053019614547741
Maffi, L. y Woodley, E. (2010). Biocultural Diversity Conservation: A Global Sourcebook. Routledge.
Maffi, L. (2007). Biocultural Diversity and Sustainability. En Pretty, J., Ball, A.S., Benton, T., Guivant, J.S., Lee, D.R., Orr, D., Pfeffer, M.J., y Ward, H. (eds), The SAGE Handbook of Environment and Society (267-278). SAGE Publications Ltd.
Maffi, L. (2005). Linguistic, Cultural, and Biological Diversity. Annual Review of Anthropology, 34, 599-638. 10.1146/annurev.anthro.34.081804.120437
May, J. R. y Baber, W.F. (2023). Conclusion: Environmental Human Rights in the Anthropocene. En May, J. R., y Baber, W. F. (eds.), Environmental Human Rights in the Anthropocene. Concepts, Contexts, and Challenges (213-221). Cambridge University Press.
Meine, C. (2010). Conservation Biology: Past and Present. En Sodhi, N.S., y Ehrlich, P. R. (eds.), Conservation Biology for All (7-26). Oxford University Press.
Morgera, E., Buck, M., y Tsioumani, E. (2014). Unraveling the Nagoya Protocol - A Commentary on Access and Benefit-sharing to the Convention on Biological Diversity. Brill.
Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. (2011). Analytical Study on the Relationship between Human Rights and the Environment, 16 December 2011, A/HRC/19/34.
Posey, D. A. (1999). Cultural and Spiritual Values of Biodiversity. A Complementary Contribution to the Global Biodiversity Assessment. Intermediate Technology Publication.
Pretty, J., Adams, B., Berkes, F., Ferreira de Athayde, S., Dudley, N., Hunn, E., Maffi, E. y et al. (2009). The Intersections of Biological Diversity and Cultural Diversity: Towards Integration. Conservation and Society, 7 (2), 100-112. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26392968
Raz, J. (1988). The Morality of Freedom. Clarendon Press.
Redford, K. (1991). The Ecologically Noble Savage. Cultural Survival Quarterly, 15 (1), 46-48. https://www.culturalsurvival.org/publications/cultural-survival-quarterly/ecologically-noble-savage
Reed, M.S. (2008). Stakeholder Participation for Environmental Management: A Literature Review. Biological Conservation, 141 (10), 2417-2431. 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.07.014
Sajeva, G., Borrini-Feyerabend, y G. y Niederberberger, T. (2019). Meanings and More... Policy Brief of the ICCA Consortium in collaboration with Cenesta, Issue No. 7.
Sajeva, G. (2018). When Rights Embrace Responsibilities. Biocultural Rights and the Conservation of the Environment. Oxford University Press.
Sajeva, G. (2019). Inside-out. Internal and External Limits to Rights: does it matter?. Diritto & questioni pubbliche, XIX (2), 201-223. https://www.dirittoequestionipubbliche.org/page/2019_n19-2/DQ_XIX_2019-2_01-studi_09_Sajeva.pdf
Sajeva, G. (2021). Environmentally-conditioned Human Rights: a Good Idea?. En Corrigan, D., Oksanen, M. (eds.). Rights of Nature. A re-examination (85-101). Routledge Explorations in Environmental Studies.
Sajeva, G. (2025). Rights for Ecosystem Services. Local Communities and the Rights of Nature. Routledge.
Schmidt, P. M. y Peterson, M. J. (2009). Biodiversity Conservation and Indigenous Land Management in the Era of Self-Determination. Conservation Biology, 23(6),1458-1466. 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01262.x
Shelton, D. (2020). The Rights of Indigenous Peoples: Everything Old Is New Again. En von Arnauld, A., von der Decken, K., y Susi, M. (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of New Human Rights (217-232). Cambridge University Press.
Special Rapporteur on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (2017). Impacts of Climate Change and Climate Finance on Indigenous Peoples’ Rights, A/HRC/36/46.
Stone, C. (1972). Should Trees Have Standing? Toward Legal Rights for Natural Objects. South California Law Review, 45, 450-501. https://southerncalifornialawreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Christopher-D.-Stone-Should-Trees-Have-Standing_%E2%80%94Toward-Legal-Rights-for-Natural-Objects-45-S.-CAL.-L.-REV.-450-1972..pdf
Studley, J. y Bleisch, W. V. (2018). Juristic Personhood for Sacred Natural Sites: A Potential Means for Protecting Nature. Parks Journal, 24, 81-96. 10.2305/IUCN.CH.2018.PARKS-24-1JS.en
Sunderland, T., Campese, J., Greiber, T., y Oviedo, G. (2009). Rights-based Approaches. Exploring Issues and Opportunities for Conservation. International Union for the Conservation of Nature and IFOR.
Taylor, P. E. (2008). Ecological Integrity and Human Rights. Introducing the Rights Versus Responsibilities Debate. En Westra, L., Bosselmann, K., y Westra, R. (eds.). Reconciling Human Existence with Ecological Integrity. Science, Ethics, Economics and Law (89-108). Routledge.
UN Department of Economic and Social Affair. (2019). State of the World’s Indigenous Peoples. Implementing the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, Vol. ST/ESA/371.
Waldron, J. (1993). Rights in Conflict. En Waldron, J. (ed.), Liberal Rights. Collected Papers. 1981-1991 (203-224). Cambridge University Press.
Wilson, E. O. (2016). Half the Earth. Our Planet’s Fight for Life. Liveright Publishing Corporation.
Witter, R. y Satterfield, T. (2019). The Ebb and Flow of Indigenous Rights Recognitions in Conservation Policy. Development and Change, 50, 1083-1108. https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12456
Zanjani, L. V., Govan, H., Jonas, H.C., Karfakis, T., Mwamidi, D.M., Stewart, J., Walters, G. y Dominguez, P. (2023). Territories of Life as Key to Global Environmental Sustainability. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 63, Article 101298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101298
Posey, D. A. (1999). Cultural and Spiritual Values of Biodiversity: A Complementary Contribution to the Global Biodiversity Assessment. Intermediate Technology Publication.
Wilson, K. (2016). Flourishing at Twenty: On Context and Foundations in the Rise of the Concept of Biocultural Diversity. Terralingua Langscape, 5 (2), 10-15. https://terralingua.org/stories/flourishing-at-twenty-on-context-and-foundations-in-the-rise-of-the-concept-of-biocultural/
Dutfield, G. (1999). Rights, Resources and Responses. En Posey D. A. (ed.), Cultural and Spiritual Values of Biodiversity. A Complementary Contribution to the Global Biodiversity Assessment (503-550). Intermediate Technology Publication.
Slikkerveer, J. L. (1999). Ethnoscience, “TEK” and Its Application to Conservation. En Posey D. A. (ed.), Cultural and Spiritual Values of Biodiversity. A Complementary Contribution to the Global Biodiversity Assessment (169-180). Intermediate Technology Publication.
Downloads
Published
-
Abstract14
-
PDF 9
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 EUNOMÍA. Revista en Cultura de la Legalidad

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 3.0 Unported License.
Eunomía. Revista en Cultura de la Legalidad is a duly registered journal, with EISSN 2253-6655.
The articles published in Eunomía are –unless indicated otherwise– under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivative Works 3.0 Spain license. You can copy, distribute and communicate them publicly as long as you cite their author and the journal and institution that publishes them and do not make derivative works with them. The full license can be consulted at: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/es/deed.es
How to Cite
Funding data
-
Università degli Studi di Palermo
Grant numbers 2022YK45F9_001 – CUP B53D23010990006