Between Arbitrary and Reasonable. A Criticism of the (Neo)Constitutionalism
Keywords:
Reasonableness, rationality, arbitrary, justice, equity, flexibility, discrimination, constitutionalismAbstract
The author reviews different possible meanings of the notion of “reasonableness of the law”. He analyses the main thesis on reasonableness of the so-called neocostituzionalismo (neoconstitutionalism), focusing on the relationship between this thesis and the rule of law as a limit to arbitrary power. He discusses the theory of the reasonable balancing of principles as a way to take the “correct decision” in a judicial case as well as the theory of legal argumentation in relation to the problem of flexibility in decision-making. In conclusion, the author discusses the relationship between neo-constitutionalism and cognitivist thesis in meta-ethics.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Eunomía. Revista en Cultura de la Legalidad is a duly registered journal, with EISSN 2253-6655.
The articles published in Eunomía are –unless indicated otherwise– under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivative Works 3.0 Spain license. You can copy, distribute and communicate them publicly as long as you cite their author and the journal and institution that publishes them and do not make derivative works with them. The full license can be consulted at: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/es/deed.es