La autoreferencia en el Derecho Internacional
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20318/eunomia.2025.9844Palabras clave:
Autoreferencia, régimen de autonomía, incorporación, apertura, pluralismo legal internacional, arbitraje regulatorioResumen
La autorreferencia permea el derecho internacional. Los regímenes basados en tratados –las formas más sólidas de autoridad internacional– suelen coexistir, exhibiendo patrones de pluralismo jurídico. Como construcciones autorreferenciales, los regímenes especiales operan como subsistemas abiertos del derecho internacional que gestionan la incorporación de otras normas y decisiones internacionales. Su autonomía relativa encarna la lógica del funcionalismo intergubernamental. En ausencia de órganos o procedimientos generales para su integración, esta situación permite crear perspectivas jurídicas internacionales igualmente válidas –aunque potencialmente divergentes– sobre cuestiones y casos. A pesar de las interpretaciones armonizadoras (i.e., la denominada integración sistémica) por parte de los órganos de los tratados, avanzar la consistencia jurídica internacional, o equilibrar eficazmente los bienes y valores públicos globales, sigue siendo un significativo desafío colectivo. La competencia y el arbitraje normativo resultantes de los regímenes basados en tratados lo ilustran con claridad, revelando las limitaciones de la falta de integración procedimental general representa para el Estado de derecho moderno.
Descargas
Referencias
Abi Saab, G. (1987). Cours général de Droit international public. Recueil des Cours, Vol. 207, 119–126.
Ago, R. (1971). Third report on state responsibility. Yearbook of the International Law Commission, Vol. II(1), UN Doc. A/CN.4/246.
Arangio-Ruiz, G. (1995). Seventh report on state responsibility. Yearbook of the International Law Commission, Vol. II(1), UN Doc. A/CN.4/469.
Bentham, J. (1823). An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation (Vol. 2). W. Pickers & R.Wilson.
Benton, L. (2002). Law and colonial cultures: Legal regimes in world history, 1400–1900. Cambridge University Press.
Benvenisti, E. (2014). The law of global governance. Recueil des Cours, Vol. 368, 47–435.
Benvenisti, E. (2016). Democracy captured: The mega-regional agreements and the future of global public law. Constellations, 23, 58–70.
Benvenisti, E., & Downs, G. W. (2007). The empire's new clothes: Political economy and the fragmentation of international law. Stanford Law Review, 60, 595–631.
Benvenisti, E., & Downs, G. W. (2009). Toward global checks and balances. Constitutional Political Economy, 20, 366–387.
Benvenisti, E., & Nolte, G. (eds.) (2018). Community interests across international law. Oxford University Press.
Bianchi, A., & Zarbiyev, F. (2024). What’s the purpose of ‘object and purpose’? In Demystifying treaty interpretation (pp. 118–141). Cambridge University Press.
Bingham, T. (2010). The rule of law. Allen Lane.
Braithwaite, J. (2008). Regulatory capitalism: How it works, ideas for making it work better. Edward Elgar.
Braithwaite, J., & Drahos, P. (2000). Global business regulation. Cambridge University Press.
Brölmann, C. (2005). Limits of the treaty paradigm. In M. Craven & M. Fitzmaurice (eds.), Interrogating the treaty and the future of treaty law (pp. 1–18). Wolf Legal Publishers.
Brölmann, C. (2007). The institutional veil in public international law: International organizations and the law of treaties. Hart.
Brölmann, C. (2023). International organizations and the disaggregation of consent. In S. Besson (ed.), Consenting to international law (pp. 100–116). Cambridge University Press.
Brown Weiss, E. (2022). Establishing norms in a kaleidoscopic world. Brill.
Brownlie, I. (1998). The rule of law in international affairs. In International law at the fiftieth anniversary of the United Nations (pp. 3–8). The Hague Academy of International Law, Martinus Nijhoff.
Buffard, I., & Zemanek, K. (1998). The ‘Object and Purpose’ of a treaty: An enigma? Austrian Review of International and European Law, 3, 311–343.
Cahier, P. (1988). L’ordre juridique interne des organisations internationales. In Manuel sur les organisations internationales: A handbook on international organizations (pp. 237–257). Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Cassese, S. (2005). Administrative law without the state? The challenge of global regulation. New York University Journal of International Law and Politics (37): 663–694.
Cassese, S. (2011). A global due process of law? In G. Anthony, J.-B. Auby, J. Morison, & T. Zwart (Eds.), Values in global administrative law (pp. 3–13). Hart Publishing.
Cassese, S. (2015). Global administrative law: The state of the art. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 13, 465–468.
Cassese, S. (2021). Advanced introduction to global administrative law. Edward Elgar.
Churchill, R. R., & Ulfstein, G. (2000). Autonomous institutional arrangements in multilateral environmental agreements: A little-noticed phenomenon in international law. American Journal of International Law, 94, 623–659.
Coffee, J. C., Jr. (1998). Competition versus cooperation: The future of regulation. Columbia Law Review, 98, 1193–1209.
Colin Scott. (2017). The regulatory state and beyond. In P. Drahos (ed.), Regulatory Theory: Foundations and Applications (pp. 265–280). ANU Press.
Combacau, J. (1986). Le droit international: bric-à-brac ou système? Archives de philosophie du droit, 31, 85–98.
Correa, C. (2004). Implementation of the WTO General Council Decision on paragraph 6 of the Doha Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement and public health. Journal of World Intellectual Property, 7, 257–273.
Cottier, T. (2015). The common law of international trade and the future of the WTO. Journal of International Economic Law, 18, 3–20.
d’Aspremont, J. (2018). Monism and dualism in international law. In A. Carty (ed.), Oxford bibliographies in international law. Oxford University Press.
Díaz, E. (2010). Estado de derecho y sociedad democrática (Rev. and expanded ed.). Taurus. (Original work published 1966).
Drahos, P. (2017). Regulating capitalism’s processes of destruction. In P. Drahos (ed.), Regulatory theory: Foundations and applications (Vol. 1, pp. 761–783). ANU Press.
Dunoff, J. L. (2017). The multifaceted relationship between functionalism and global constitutionalism. In A. F. Lang & A. Wiener (eds.), Handbook on global constitutionalism. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Dunoff, J. L., & Trachtman, J. P. (1999). Economic analysis of international law. Yale Journal of International Law, 24, 1–59.
Dupuy, P.-M. (1997). The constitutional dimension of the Charter of the United Nations revisited. Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law, 1, 1–33.
Dworkin, R. (2013). Taking rights seriously. Bloomsbury Academic. (Original work published 1977).
Eco, U. (1994). Apocalypse Postponed: Essays by Umberto Eco. Indiana University Press.
Elster, J. (1979). Ulysses and the sirens: Studies in rationality and irrationality. Cambridge University Press.
Falk Moore, S. (2005). Certainties undone: Fifty turbulent years of legal anthropology, 1949–1999. In S. Falk Moore (ed.), Law and anthropology: A reader. Blackwell.
Falk, R. (1959). International jurisdiction: Horizontal and vertical conceptions of legal order. Temple Law Quarterly, 32, 295–320.
Fassbender, B. (1998). The United Nations Charter as constitution of the international community. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 36, 529–619.
Fassbender, B. (2009). The United Nations Charter as the Constitution of the International Community. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Gehring, T., & Faude, B. (2014). A theory of emerging order within institutional complexes: How competition among regulatory international institutions leads to institutional adaptation and division of labor. Review of International Organizations, 9, 471–498.
Ginsburg, T. (2020). Authoritarian international law? American Journal of International Law, 114, 241–252.
Gottlieb, G. (1972). The nature of international law: Toward a second concept of law. In The Future of the International Legal Order (Vol. IV, pp. 331–383). Princeton University Press.
Grewe, W. G. (2000). The epochs of international law. Walter de Gruyter.
Griffiths, J. (2005). The idea of sociology of law and its relation to law and to sociology. In M. Freeman (ed.), Law and sociology: Current legal issues (Vol. 8, pp. 49–67). Oxford University Press.
Habermas, J. (2006). Does the constitutionalization of international law still have a chance? In The Divided West (pp. 159–165). Polity.
Hart, H. L. A. (1961/2012). The Concept of Law. Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1961).
Hart, H. L. A. (1983). Self-referring laws. In Essays in jurisprudence and philosophy (pp. 170–189). Oxford University Press.
Hawkins, D., Lake, D., Nielson, D., & Tierney, M. (2006). Delegation and agency in international organizations. Cambridge University Press.
Helfer, L. R. (2004). Regime-shifting: The TRIPs Agreement and new dynamics of international intellectual property lawmaking. Yale Journal of International Law, 29, 1–83.
Hirschman, A. O. (1970). Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Harvard University Press.
Hoekman, B. M., & Mavroidis, P. C. (2016). World Trade Organization: Law, Economics, and Politics (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Hollis, D. B. (2010). The object and purpose of a treaty: Three interpretive methods. Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, 43, 623–679.
Hubert Thierry. (1990). The thought of Georges Scelle. European Journal of International Law, 1, 193–20.
Hudec, R. (1970) The GATT Legal System: A Diplomat's Jurisprudence. Journal of World Trade 5, 615 –665.
Hudec, R. (1990) The GATT legal system and world trade diplomacy. Butterworth Legal Publishers.
Hurd, I. (2017). How to do things with international law. Princeton University Press.
ICJ. (1949). Reparation for Injuries Suffered in the Service of the United Nations, ICJ Reports.
ICJ. (1980). Interpretation of the Agreement of 25 March 1951 between the WHO and Egypt, ICJ Reports.
ICJ. (1996). Legality of the Use by a State of Nuclear Weapons in Armed Conflict (Advisory Opinion), Dissenting Opinion of Judge Weeramantry, ICJ Reports.
ICTY. (1995). Prosecutor v. Duško Tadić, Decision on the Defence Motion for Interlocutory Appeal on Jurisdiction, Appeals Chamber, 2 October.
International Law Commission (ILC). (1962). Yearbook of the International Law Commission, Vol. II.
International Law Commission (ILC). (2001). Draft articles on responsibility of states for internationally wrongful acts, with commentaries. Yearbook of the ILC, Vol. II, Part Two, UN Doc. A/56/10.
International Law Commission (ILC). (2006, April 13). Report of the International Law Commission, 58th session, UN Doc. A/CN.4/L.682. Yearbook of the ILC, Vol. II(2), 1–479 (UN Doc. A/CN.4/L.682).
Jackson, J. (1993). Trade, environment and NAFTA: Introductory remarks. Georgetown International Environmental Law Review, 6, 519–522.
Jackson, J. H. (1997). The world trading system: Law and policy of international economic relations (2nd ed.). MIT Press.
Jenks, C. W. (1951). Co-ordination: A new problem of international organization. Recueil des Cours, Vol. 78, 55–149.
Jenks, W. (1945). Some constitutional problems of international organizations. British Yearbook of International Law, 22, 11–69.
Joint Statement of the Russian Federation and the People’s Republic of China on the International Relations Entering a New Era and the Global Sustainable Development. (2022, February 4).
Jordana, J., Levi-Faur, D., & Marín, X. (2011). The global diffusion of regulatory agencies: Channels of transfer and stages of diffusion. Comparative Political Studies, 44, 1343–1369.
Kelsen, H. (1946). Organization and procedure of the Security Council of the United Nations. Harvard Law Review, 59, 1087–1129.
Kelsen, H. (1948). Collective security and collective self-defence under the Charter of the United Nations. American Journal of International Law, 42, 783–796.
Kelsen, H. (1950). The law of the United Nations: A critical analysis of its fundamental problems. Stevens & Sons.
Kennedy, D. (1987). The move to institutions. Cardozo Law Review, 8, 841–988.
Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S. (2001). The club model of multilateral cooperation and problems of democratic legitimacy. In R. B. Porter, P. Sauvé, A. Subramanian, & A. Zampetti (Eds.), Efficiency, equity, and legitimacy: The multilateral trading system at the millennium (pp. 264–294). Brookings Institution Press.
Kingsbury, B., Krisch, N., & Stewart, R. B. (2005). The emergence of global administrative law. Law and Contemporary Problems, 68, 15–61.
Klabbers, J. (2001). The life and times of the law of international organizations. Nordic Journal of International Law, 70, 287–288.
Klabbers, J. (2007). Checks and balances in the law of international organizations. In M. Sellers (Ed.), Autonomy in the law (pp. 141–166). Springer.
Klabbers, J. (2008). The paradox of international institutional law. International Organizations Law Review, 5, 1–23.
Klabbers, J. (2009). An introduction to international institutional law (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Klabbers, J. (2014). The emergence of functionalism in international institutional law: Colonial inspirations. European Journal of International Law, 25, 645–675.
Klabbers, J. (2015). The transformation of international organizations law. European Journal of International Law, 26, 9–82.
Klabbers, J. (2016). The transformation of international organizations law: A rejoinder. European Journal of International Law, 27, 549–562.
Klabbers, J. (2022). The love of crisis. In M. M. Mbengue & J. d’Aspremont (eds.), Crisis narratives in international law (pp. 9–26). Brill.
Koskenniemi, M. (1990). The politics of international law. European Journal of International Law, 1, 3–32.
Koskenniemi, M. (2002). The gentle civilizer of nations: The rise and fall of international law 1870–1960. Cambridge University Press.
Koskenniemi, M. (2007). International law: Constitutionalism, managerialism and the ethos of legal education. European Journal of Legal Studies, 1. (Accessed July 12, 2023).
Koskenniemi, M. (2007). The fate of public international law: Between technique and politics. Modern Law Review, 70, 1–30.
Koskenniemi, M. (2009a). The case for comparative international law. Finnish Yearbook of International Law, 20, 1–32.
Koskenniemi, M. (2009b). The politics of international law–20 years later. European Journal of International Law, 20, 7–19.
Koskenniemi, M. (2011). Hegemonic regimes. In M. Young (Ed.), Regime interaction in international law: Facing fragmentation (pp. 305–324). Cambridge University Press.
Koskenniemi, M. (2021). To the uttermost parts of the earth: Legal imagination and international power, 1300–1870. Cambridge University Press.
Kuijper, P. J. (1994). The law of GATT as a special field of international law: Ignorance, further refinement or self-contained system of international law? Netherlands Yearbook of International Law, 25, 227–258.
Kuijper, P. J. (2022). Delegation and international organizations. Recueil des Cours, Vol. 426, 9–240.
Kunz, J. L. (1953). General international law and the law of international organizations. American Journal of International Law, 47, 456–462.
Lamy, P. (2006). The place of the WTO and its law in the international legal order. European Journal of International Law, 17, 969–984.
Laporta, F. J. (2007). El imperio de la ley: Una visión actual. Trotta.
Laporta, F. J. (2014). ¿Imperio de la ley o gobierno del capital? Teoría Política. Nuova Serie. Annali, IV, 103–123.
Lauwaars, H. (1984). The interrelationship between United Nations law and the law of other international organizations. Michigan Law Review, 82, 1604–1619.
League of Nations. (1930). Acts of the Conference for the Codification of International Law, Official No.: C. 351. M. 145. 1930. Vol. I, Plenary Meetings (13 March).
Legality of the use by a state of nuclear weapons in armed conflict, Advisory Opinion, ICJ Reports (1996).
Levi-Faur, D. (2005). The global diffusion of regulatory capitalism. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 598, 12–32.
Liang, Y.-L. (1948). The General Assembly and the progressive development and codification of international law. American Journal of International Law, 42, 70–77.
Lindblom, C. E. (1959). The science of ‘muddling through’. Public Administration Review, 19, 79–88.
Mahoney, J., & Thelen, K. (2010). Explaining institutional change: Ambiguity, agency, and power. Cambridge University Press.
Majone, G. (1994). The rise of the regulatory state in Europe. West European Politics, 17, 77–101.
Majone, G. (Ed.). (1990). Deregulation or re-regulation? Pinter Publishers.
Mamlyuk, B., & Mattei, U. (2011). Comparative international law. Brooklyn Journal of International Law, 36, 385–452.
Mann, F. A. (1964). The doctrine of jurisdiction in international law. Recueil des Cours, Vol. 111, 1–162.
Marschik, A. (1998). Too much order? The impact of special secondary norms on the unity and efficacy of the international legal system. European Journal of International Law, 9, 212–239.
McLachlan, C. (2005). The principle of systemic integration and Article 31(3)(c) of the Vienna Convention. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 54, 279–320.
McLachlan, C. (2024). The principle of systemic integration in international law. Oxford University Press.
Merkouris, P. (2015). Article 31(3)(c) VCLT and the principle of systemic integration: Normative shadows in Plato’s cave. Brill/Martinus Nijhoff.
Merkouris, P. (2020). Principle of systemic integration. In Max Planck Encyclopedia of International Procedural Law.
Mommsen, W. J., & de Moor, J. A. (Eds.). (1992). European expansion and law: The encounter of European and indigenous law in 19th- and 20th-century Africa and Asia. Berg.
Morse, J., & Keohane, R. (2014). Contested multilateralism. The Review of International Organizations, 9, 385–412.
Müller, J.-W. (2016). What is populism? University of Pennsylvania Press.
Pauwelyn, J., & Alschner, W. (2015). Forget about the WTO: The network of relations between PTAs and ‘double PTAs’. In A. Dür & M. Elsig (eds.), Trade cooperation: The purpose, design and effects of preferential trade agreements (pp. 21–48). Cambridge University Press.
Pauwelyn, J., Wessel, R. A., & Wouters, J. (2014). When structures become shackles: Stagnation and dynamics in international lawmaking. European Journal of International Law, 25, 733–763.
Pavel, C. E. (2018). Is international law a Hartian legal system? Ratio Juris, 31, 307–325.
Payandeh, M. (2011). The concept of international law in the jurisprudence of H.L.A. Hart. European Journal of International Law, 21, 967–995.
Picciotto, S. (2011a). Regulating global corporate capitalism. Cambridge University Press.
Picciotto, S. (2011b). International transformations of the capitalist state. Antipode, 43, 87–107.
Picciotto, S. (2022). Technocracy in the era of Twitter: Between intergovernmentalism and supranational technocratic politics in global tax governance. Regulation & Governance, 16, 634–652.
Project for a Constitution of the United States of Europe. (1944, March 25). Drafted by Fernando de los Ríos and Arnold J. Zurcher, Legal Committee of the Pan Europa Conference.
Prost, M. (2012). The concept of unity in public international law. Hart Publishing.
Raustiala, K., & Victor, D. G. (2004). The regime complex for plant genetic resources. International Organization, 58, 277–309.
Riphagen, W. (1982). Third report on state responsibility. Yearbook of the International Law Commission, Vol. I & II.
Riphagen, W. (1983). Fourth report on state responsibility. Yearbook of the International Law Commission, Vol. II(1).
Roberts, A., Stephan, P. B., Verdier, P.-H., & Versteeg, M. (2015). Comparative international law: Framing the field. American Journal of International Law, 109, 467–474.
Roberts, A., Stephan, P. B., Verdier, P.-H., & Versteeg, M. (eds.). (2017). Comparative international law. Oxford University Press.
Romano, S. (1963). El ordenamiento jurídico. Instituto de Estudios Políticos.
Rosenne, S. (2021). Rosenne’s The World Court: What it is and how it works (7th rev. ed., D. Richemond-Barak, ed.). Brill Nijhoff.
Ross, A. (1969). On self-reference and a puzzle in constitutional law. Mind (309): 1–24.
Russia–China Joint Declaration on Promotion and Principles of International Law. (2016, June 25).
Santos, B. de S. (1987). Law: A map of misreading. Toward a postmodern conception of law. Journal of Law and Society, 14, 279–302.
Santos, B. de S. (1995). Toward a new common sense: Law, science and politics in the paradigmatic transition. Routledge.
Sauca, J. M. (2001). Autorreferencia y contradicción en la derogación del procedimiento de reforma constitucional. El puzzle de Alf Ross. In Cuestiones lógicas de la derogación de normas (pp. 77–173). Fontamara.
Scelle, G. (1932). Précis de droit des gens (Vol. I).
Scelle, G. (1934). Précis de droit des gens (Vol. II).
Scelle, G. (1956). Le phénomène du dédoublement fonctionnel. In Rechtfragen der Internationalen Organisation: Festschrift für H. Weberg (pp. 324–342).
Scheppele, K. L. (2018). Autocratic legalism. University of Chicago Law Review (85): 545–583.
Scott, C. (2017). The regulatory state and beyond. In P. Drahos (ed.), Regulatory theory: Foundations and applications (pp. 265–280). ANU Press.
Seidl-Hohenveldern, I. (1998). Hierarchy of treaties. In Essays on the law of treaties: A collection of essays in honour of Bert Vierlag. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Simma, B. (1985). Self-contained regimes. Netherlands Yearbook of International Law, 16, 111–136.
Simma, B. (1994). From bilateralism to community interest in international law. Recueil des Cours, Vol. 250, 217–384.
Simma, B., & Pulkowski, D. (2006). Of planets and the universe: Self-contained regimes in international law. European Journal of International Law, 17, 483–529.
Sørensen, M. (1983). Autonomous legal orders: Some considerations relating to a systems analysis of international organisations in the world legal order. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 32, 559–576.
Stone Sweet, A. (2004). The judicial construction of Europe. Oxford University Press.
Suber, P. (1990). The paradox of self-amendment: A study of logic, law, omnipotence, and change. Peter Lang.
Suber, P. (1999). Self-reference in law. In C. B. Gray (ed.), Philosophy of law: An encyclopedia (Vol. 2, pp. 790–792). Garland Publishing.
Sunstein, C. R. (2024). Separation of powers is a they, not an it. Harvard Public Law Working Paper No. 24-15.
Tamanaha, B. Z. (1993). The folly of the ‘social scientific’ concept of legal pluralism. Journal of Law and Society, 20, 192–217.
Tamanaha, B. Z. (2000). A non-essentialist version of legal pluralism. Journal of Law and Society, 27, 296–321.
Tamanaha, B. Z. (2004). On the rule of law: History, politics, theory. Cambridge University Press.
Thierry, H. (1990). The thought of Georges Scelle. European Journal of International Law (1): 193–206.
Tomuschat, C. (1999). International law: Ensuring the survival of mankind on the eve of a new century. Recueil des Cours, Vol. 281, 9–438.
Trachtman, J. P. (1993). International regulatory competition, externalization, and jurisdiction. Harvard International Law Journal, 34, 47–104.
Trachtman, J. P. (1996). The international economic law revolution. University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law, 17, 33–49.
Trachtman, J. P. (2008). The economic structure of international law. Harvard University Press.
Trachtman, J. P. (2013). The future of international law: Global government. Cambridge University Press.
United Nations Treaty Collection. (2025, July 13). Chapter XXIII.
Valticos, N. (1996). Pluralité des ordres juridiques internationaux et unité du droit international. In J. Makarczyk (ed.), Theory of international law at the threshold of the 21st century: Essays in honour of Krzysztof Skubiszewski (pp. 623–632). Kluwer Law.
van Creveld, M. (1999). The rise and decline of the state. Cambridge University Press.
Verdier, P.-H., & Versteeg, M. (2019). Separation of powers, treaty-making, and treaty withdrawal: A global survey. In C. A. Bradley (ed.), The Oxford handbook of comparative foreign relations law (pp. 135–155). Oxford University Press.
Vogel, D. (1996). Kindred strangers: The uneasy relationship between politics and business in America. Princeton University Press.
von Bogdandy, A., & Venzke, I. (2012). In whose name? An investigation of international courts’ public authority and its democratic justification. European Journal of International Law, 23, 7–41.
von Bogdandy, A., Goldmann, M., & Venzke, I. (2017). From public international to international public law: Translating world public opinion into international public authority. European Journal of International Law, 28, 115–145.
von Bogdandy, A., Wolfrum, R., von Bernstorff, J., Dann, P., & Goldmann, M. (Eds.). (2010). The exercise of public authority by international institutions: Advancing international institutional law. Springer.
Waldron, J. (2011). Are sovereigns entitled to the benefit of the international rule of law? European Journal of International Law, 22, 315–343.
Weiler, J. H. H. (1991). The transformation of Europe. Yale Law Journal, 100, 2403–2483.
Wellens, K. (1994). Diversity in secondary rules and the unity of international law. Netherlands Yearbook of International Law, 25, 3–37.
Woodman, G. R. (1998). Ideological combat and social observation: Recent debate about legal pluralism. The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 42, 21–59.
World Conference on Constitutional Justice (WCCJ). (2017). Declaration on the Rule of Law, Vilnius.
WTO General Council. (2003). Implementation of paragraph 6 of the Doha Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement and Public Health, WT/L/540 and Corr.1, 1 September.
WTO. (2001). Doha Ministerial Declaration, WT/MIN(01)/DEC/1, 20 November. WTO. (2001). Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement and Public Health, WT/MIN(01)/DEC/2, 20 November.
Yergin, D., & Stanislaw, J. (1998). The commanding heights: The battle for the world economy. Simon & Schuster.
Zapatero, P. (2000). Level up: A history of regime-building at GATT club. Cuadernos de Derecho Transnacional, 12, 818-839.
Zapatero, P. (2006). Searching for coherence in global economic policymaking. Penn State International Law Review, 24, 595–627.
Zapatero, P. (2014). World-scale market segmentation: Market-driven solutions to the 'Paragraph 6' issue. Journal of World Trade, 48, 137–162.
Zapatero, P. (2015). Little islands: Limits and prospects of the United Nations Chief Executive Board. Cuadernos de Derecho Transnacional, 7, 369–380.
Zapatero, P. (forthcoming, 2025a). Anatomy of treaty-based regimes.
Zapatero, P. (forthcoming, 2025b). The logic of treaty antinomy.
Zapatero, V. (2019). The art of legislation. Springer.
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Eunomía. Revista en Cultura de la Legalidad es una revista debidamente registrada, con EISSN 2253-6655.
Los textos publicados en esta revista están –si no se indica lo contrario– bajo una licencia Reconocimiento-Sin obras derivadas 3.0 España de Creative Commons. Puede copiarlos, distribuirlos y comunicarlos públicamente siempre que cite su autor y la revista y la institución que los publica y no haga con ellos obras derivadas. La licencia completa se puede consultar en: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/es/deed.es