Patrimonios, servicios públicos, asequibilidad

Hacia una lectura ecológica de Jenofonte

  • Tazuko Angela van Berkel Leiden University
Palabras clave: Jenofonte, uso, utilidad, prestaciones, ecocrítica, economía ecológica, epistemologías sujeto-objeto

Resumen

Uno de los principios fundamentales del pensamiento económico de Jenofonte es la doctrina del uso adecuado: los χρήµατα (“riquezas”, “patrimonio” o, literalmente, “utilidades”) solo pueden considerarse como tales si son debitamente utilizados (χρῆσθαι, Oeconomicus 1, 8-10). Al desarrollar esta idea, Jenofonte parece acercarse a articular una distinción entre valor de uso y valor de cambio. Lo que tiende a pasarse por alto en los debates sobre esta doctrina es el propio concepto subyacente de “uso”. Los supuestos epistemológicos y éticos actuales deforman nuestra comprensión de la concepción de Jenofonte acerca de “utilidad” y “uso”. Este artículo es un ejercicio para “repensar” estos supuestos a través de la lente crítica que ofrecen la economía ecológica y la ecocrítica. Se argumentará que la doctrina de Jenofonte sobre el uso adecuado es “ecológica”, en el sentido de que propugna una relacionalidad entrelazada, recíproca e interdependiente entre sujeto y objeto. El oikonomos ideal no percibe su entorno como exógeno a él; más bien, su misión es participar en el orden más amplio de las cosas.

Descargas

La descarga de datos todavía no está disponible.
Consultas del resumen: 27
PDF (English) : 19

Citas

Agamben, G. (2015), The Use of Bodies , Stanford.

Anderson, E. (1993), Value in Ethics and Economics, Cambridge.

Bénatouïl, T. (2006), Fair usage: la pratique du Stoïcisme, Paris.

Benveniste, E. (1950), «Actif et moyen dans le verbe», Journal de Psychologie Normale et Pathologique 43, 121-129.

Bloch, M, Parry, J. (1989), «Introduction: Money and the Morality of Exchange», in J. Parry, M. Bloch (eds.), Money and the Morality of Exchange , Cambridge, 1-32.

Bookchin, M. (1982), The Ecology of Freedom: the Emergence and Dissolution of Hierarchy, Palo Alto.

Boulding, K.F. (1966), «The Economics of the Coming Spaceship Earth», in H. Jarrett (ed.), Environmental Quality in a Growing Economy: Essays from the Sixth RFF Forum, Baltimore MD.

Brancacci, A. (2005), Antisthène: le discours propre, Paris.

Brockliss, W. (2018), «‘Dark Ecology’ and the Works and Days», Helios 45, 1-36.

Chemchuru, M. (2017), «Elements of Environmental Ethics in Ancient Greek Philosophy», Phronimon 18, 15-30.

Chemero, A. (2003), «An Outline of a Theory of Affordances», Ecological Psychology 152, 181-195.

Chemero, A. (2009), Radical Embodied Cognitive Science, Cambridge MA.

Codovana, O.D, Chiai, G.F. (eds.) (2017), Pollution and the Environment in Ancient Life and Thought, Stuttgart.

Danzig, G. (2003), «Why Socrates was not a farmer: Xenophon’s Oeconomicus as a philosophical dialogue», Greece and Rome S. 2, 50, 1, 57-76.

Figueira, T.J. (2012), «Economic thought and economic fact in the works of Xenophon», in F. Hobden, C. Tuplin (eds.), Xenophon: Ethical Principles and Historical Enquiry , Leiden-Boston, 665-688.

Figueira, T.J. (2020), «Xenophon and the Spartan Economy», in N. Richer, A. Powell (eds.), Xenophon and Sparta, Swansea, 261-289.

Finley, M.I. (1973), The Ancient Economy, Berkeley-Los Angeles.

Georgescu-Roegen, N. (1971), The Entropy Law and the Economic Process, Cambridge MA.

Georgescu-Roegen, N. (1976), Energy and Economic Myths: Institutional and Analytical Economic Essays, Oxford.

Gernet, L. (1986), «The Mythical Idea of Value in Greece», in L. Gernet, The Anthropology of Ancient Greece , Baltimore-London, 73-111.

Gibson, J.J. (1979), The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception, Boston.

Glotfelty, C, Fromm, H. (eds.) (1996), The Ecocriticism Reader. Landmarks in the Literary Ecology, Athens.

Godelier, M. (1996), L’Énigme du Don, Paris.

Gowdy, J, Erickson, J.D. (2005), «The Approach of Ecological Economics», Cambridge Journal of Economics 29, 2, 207-222.

Graeber, D. (2005), «Value: Anthropological Theories of Value», in J.G. Carrier (ed.), A Handbook of Economic Anthropology, Cheltenham.

Helmer, É. (2021), Oikonomia: Philosophie grecque de l’économie, Paris.

Helmer, É. (2022), «Agriculture and Justice in Xenophon’s Economics», Dialogos 111, 423-447.

Helmer, É. (in preparation), «Approaching Anthropocene through Economic Reciprocity in Xenophon’s Economics», in A. Čelkyte, T.A. van Berkel (eds.), Economic Epistemologies in the Graeco-Roman World.

Hinsch, M. (2021), Ökonomik und Hauswirtschaft im klassischen Griechenland, Stuttgart.

Iovino, S, Oppermann, S. (2012), Material Ecocriticism, Bloomington.

Iovino, S, Oppermann, S. (2017), «Introduction: the Environmental Humanities and the Challenges of the Anthropocene», in S. Iovino, S. Oppermann (eds.), Environmental Humanities: Voices from the Anthropocene , London, 1-21.

Johnson, D.M. (2021), Xenophon’s Socratic Works, New York.

Johnstone, S. (2011), A History of Trust in Ancient Greece, Chicago.

Lane, M. (2012), Eco-Republic: What the Ancients Can Teach Us about Ethics, Virtue, and Sustainable Living, Princeton-London.

Latour, B. (1999), Pandora’s Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies , Cambridge MA.

Lowry, S.T. (1987), The Archaeology of Economic Ideas: the Classical Greek Tradition, Durham.

Knappett, C. (2004), «The Affordances of Things: a post-Gibsonian Perspective on the Relationality of Mind and Matter», in E. Demarrais, C. Gosden, C. Renfrew (eds.), Rethinking Materiality. The Engagement of Mind with the Material World, Cambridge, 43-51.

Malte, F, Peterson, T, Schiller, J. (2002), «Homo Oeconomicus and Homo Politicus in Ecological Economics», Ecological Economics 40, 3, 323-333.

Martelli, F.K.A. (2020), Ovid, Leiden.

Marx, M. (1976 [1867]), Capital. A Critique of Political Economy, I, trans. B. Fowkes, London.

Meadows, D.H, Meadows, D.L, Randers, J, W.W. Behrens III (1972), The Limits to Growth, Falls Church VA.

Meikle, S. (1995), Aristotle’s Economic Thought, Oxford.

Moran, S, Baruah, M. (2010), «Ecological Economics», in D. Mulvaney (ed.), Green Politics: An A-to-Z Guide, Thousand Oaks CA.

Norman, D.A. (1988), The Psychology of Everyday Things, New York.

Norman, D.A. (2013), The Design of Everyday Things, New York.

Odum, H.T. (1971), Environment, Power, and Society, New York.

Perrotta, C. (2004), Consumption as Investment, I. The Fear of Goods from Hesiod to Adam Smith, New York 2004.

Pomeroy, S.B. (ed.) (1994), Xenophon, Oeconomicus. A Social and Historical Commentary, Oxford.

Price, C. (1993), Time, Discounting and Valu, Oxford.

Rédard, G. (1953), Recherches sur χρή, χρῆσθαι. Étude sémantique, Paris.

Robeyns, I. (2024), Limitarianism. The Case Against Extreme Wealth, Westminster MD.

Rueckert, W. (1978), «Literature and Ecology: an Experiment in Ecocriticism», The Iowa Review 9, 1, 71-86.

Schliephake, C. (2017), Ecocriticism, Ecology and the Cultures of Antiquity, Lanham.

Schliephake, C. (2020), The Environmental Humanities and the Ancient World, Cambridge.

Seaford, R. (2004), Money and the Early Greek Mind, Cambridge.

Schaps, D.M. (2002-2003), «Socrates and the Socratics: when wealth becomes a problem», Classical World 96, 2, 131-157.

Sedláček, T. (2011), Economics of Good and Evil, Oxford.

Siebenhüner, B. (2000), «Homo Sustinens. Towards a New Conception of Humans for the Science of Sustainability», Ecological Economics 32, 15-35.

Silver, A. (1990), «Friendship in commercial society: eighteenth-century social theory and modern sociology», American Journal of Sociology 95, 6, 1474-1504.

Smith, A. (1994 [1776]), An Enquiry into the Nature and Cause of the Wealth of Nations, edited by R.H. Campbell, A.S. Skinner, W.B. Todd, Oxford.

Steiner, F.F. (2016), Human Ecology: How Nature and Culture Shape Our World, Washington D.C.

Tredennick, H, Waterfield, R. (trans.) (1991), Conversations of Socrates, London.

Trever, A.A. (1916), A History of Greek Economic Thought, Chicago.

Urbina, D.A, Ruiz-Villaverde, A. (2019), «A Critical Review of Homo Economicus from Five Approaches», American Journal of Economics and Sociology 78, 1, 63-93.

Van Berkel, T.A. (2008), «Pricing the Invaluable: Socrates and the Value of Friendship», in R. Rosen, I. Sluiter (eds.), Valuing Others in Antiquity, Leiden, 249-278.

Van Berkel, T.A. (2018), «Socratic Economics and the Psychology of Money», in G. Danzig, D. Johnson, D. Morrison (eds), Plato and Xenophon: Comparative Studie , Leiden, 391-432.

Van Berkel, T.A. (2020), The Economics of Friendship, Leiden.

Van Berkel, T.A. (2024), «Xenophon on Money and its Right Use», in J. Tinguely (ed.), The Palgrave Handbook of Philosophy and Money, London, 263-289.

Van Berkel, T.A. (unpublished), «The Proper Use of Words and Things», paper presented at the Latin-America Regional Meeting of the International Society for Socratic Studies, Buenos Aires, 30-31 October 2023.

Van Staveren, I. (2001), The Values of Economics: an Aristotelian Perspective, London-New York.

Van Staveren, I. (2014), Economics after the Crisis. An Introduction to Economics from a Pluralist and Global Perspective, London-New York.

Von Reden, S. (1995), Exchange in Ancient Greece, London.

Zekavat, M. (2014), «Ecocriticism and Persian and Greek Myths about the Origin of Fire», Comparative Literature and Culture 16, 4, 2-8.

Publicado
2024-07-29
Cómo citar
van Berkel, T. A. (2024). Patrimonios, servicios públicos, asequibilidad: Hacia una lectura ecológica de Jenofonte. ΠΗΓΗ/FONS, 117-136. https://doi.org/10.20318/fons.2023.8344
Sección
Artículos

Datos de financiación