Chrysanthou, Anthi (2020). Defining Orphism. The Beliefs, the “Teletae” and the Writings. Berlin: De Gruyter

  • Francesc Casadesús Bordoy Universitat de les Illes Balears
DOI: https://doi.org/10.20318/arys.2022.6928

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract Views: 123
PDF (Español (España)) : 671

References

Bernabé, Alberto (1995). Una etimología platónica: σῶμα-σῆμα. Philologus, 139, pp. 204-237.

Bernabé, Alberto (2011). Platón y el orfismo. Madrid: Abada editores.

Burkert, Walter (1983). Craft versus Sect. The problem of Orphics and Pythagoreans. En Meyer y Sanders, 1983, pp. 1-22.

Meyer, Ben F. y Sanders, Ed P. (eds.). (1983). Jewish and Christian Self-definition, III. London: SCM Press.

Santamaría, Marco Antonio (2016). A Phallus Hard to Swallow. The Meaning of αἰδοῖος/-ον in the Derveni Papyrus. Classical Philology, 111, pp. 139-164.

Published
2022-10-07
How to Cite
Casadesús Bordoy, F. (2022). Chrysanthou, Anthi (2020). Defining Orphism. The Beliefs, the “Teletae” and the Writings. Berlin: De Gruyter. ARYS, (20), 425-431. https://doi.org/10.20318/arys.2022.6928
Issue
No. 20 (2022)
Section
Reviews

Authors retain the copyright of their texts, and full publishing rights without restrictions.

Since 2021, the documents include the Creative Commons 4.0 license: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Previous documents include the Creative Commons 3.0: Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works license (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0)