El concepto de orden público internacional y el derecho a un proceso justo. Nota a la STJCE de 2 de abril de 2009

Authors

  • Antonia Durán Ayago

Keywords:

extraterritorial effects of foreign decisions, resolution, international public policy, right to a fair process, rights of defense, right to be been heard

Abstract

The ECJ should elucidate if, on the base of the clause of public policy established in the article 27.1 CBr, the judge of the addressed State can take into account the fact that the judge of the State of origin has been pronounced on the pretensions of the claimant, without hearing to the defendant that it had duly appeared before him but was excluded of the procedure via a resolution, for not having certain compliment imposed obligations via an adopted resolution previously within the framework of the same procedure.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2010-10-08

Issue

Section

Varia

How to Cite

El concepto de orden público internacional y el derecho a un proceso justo. Nota a la STJCE de 2 de abril de 2009. (2010). CUADERNOS DE DERECHO TRANSNACIONAL, 2(2), 250-256. https://e-revistas.uc3m.es/index.php/CDT/article/view/127