El concepto de orden público internacional y el derecho a un proceso justo. Nota a la STJCE de 2 de abril de 2009
Keywords:
extraterritorial effects of foreign decisions, resolution, international public policy, right to a fair process, rights of defense, right to be been heardAbstract
The ECJ should elucidate if, on the base of the clause of public policy established in the article 27.1 CBr, the judge of the addressed State can take into account the fact that the judge of the State of origin has been pronounced on the pretensions of the claimant, without hearing to the defendant that it had duly appeared before him but was excluded of the procedure via a resolution, for not having certain compliment imposed obligations via an adopted resolution previously within the framework of the same procedure.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2010-10-08
Issue
Section
Varia
License
Se permite que los autores de los trabajos de investigación publicados en la Revista los reproduzcan en otros sitios siempre que se haga mención de que han sido previamente publicados en Cuadernos de Derecho Transnacional (CDT).How to Cite
El concepto de orden público internacional y el derecho a un proceso justo. Nota a la STJCE de 2 de abril de 2009. (2010). CUADERNOS DE DERECHO TRANSNACIONAL, 2(2), 250-256. https://e-revistas.uc3m.es/index.php/CDT/article/view/127