O conceito de «Actividad Dirigida» inscrito no artigo 15.º, numero 1 alinea c). Do Regulamento «Bruxelas I» e a Internet: subsidios do Tribunal de Justiça por ocãsiao do acórdão Pammer/Alpenhof
Keywords:
international jurisdiction, Regulation (EC) No 44/2001, consumer contracts, direction of activity, InternetAbstract
Inter alia, the joint ruling issued by the EUCJ on 7th December 2010 addressed the applicability of Article 15(1)(c) of Regulation EC No 44/2001 («the Brussels I Regulation») vis-à-vis the use of web sites. In particular, the Court was summoned to clarify whether, in order to justify a finding that an activity is being «directed» within the terms of the aforesaid Article, it is sufficient that a website of the party with whom a consumer has concluded a contract can be consulted on the internet. The Court answered in the negative. Further, the Court catalogued a number of factors designed at helping national courts determine whether a business is directed towards consumers in other European states. This annotation provides for a detailed review and a critical analysis of the EUCJ’s decision.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Se permite que los autores de los trabajos de investigación publicados en la Revista los reproduzcan en otros sitios siempre que se haga mención de que han sido previamente publicados en Cuadernos de Derecho Transnacional (CDT).
Los documentos incluyen la licencia Creative Commons 4.0: Atribución–No Comercial–Sin Obra Derivada (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).