O conceito de «Actividad Dirigida» inscrito no artigo 15.º, numero 1 alinea c). Do Regulamento «Bruxelas I» e a Internet: subsidios do Tribunal de Justiça por ocãsiao do acórdão Pammer/Alpenhof

Authors

  • Maria Joao Matias Fernandex

Keywords:

international jurisdiction, Regulation (EC) No 44/2001, consumer contracts, direction of activity, Internet

Abstract

Inter alia, the joint ruling issued by the EUCJ on 7th December 2010 addressed the applicability of Article 15(1)(c) of Regulation EC No 44/2001 («the Brussels I Regulation») vis-à-vis the use of web sites. In particular, the Court was summoned to clarify whether, in order to justify a finding that an activity is being «directed» within the terms of the aforesaid Article, it is sufficient that a website of the party with whom a consumer has concluded a contract can be consulted on the internet. The Court answered in the negative. Further, the Court catalogued a number of factors designed at helping national courts determine whether a business is directed towards consumers in other European states. This annotation provides for a detailed review and a critical analysis of the EUCJ’s decision.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2012-03-31

Issue

Section

Varia

How to Cite

O conceito de «Actividad Dirigida» inscrito no artigo 15.º, numero 1 alinea c). Do Regulamento «Bruxelas I» e a Internet: subsidios do Tribunal de Justiça por ocãsiao do acórdão Pammer/Alpenhof. (2012). CUADERNOS DE DERECHO TRANSNACIONAL, 4(1), 302-315. https://e-revistas.uc3m.es/index.php/CDT/article/view/1475