Jurisdiction and applicable law to claims related to the payment of contributions to the budget of an association of property owners for the maintenance of the communal areas of a building. Comment on the judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 8 May 2019, Brian Andrew Kerr v Pavlo Postnov and Natalia Postnova, C-25/18

  • Jonatan Echebarría Fernández
Keywords: actions in contract, provision of services, rights in rem, Court of Justice of the European Union, jurisdiction, applicable law, Brussels I Recast Regulation, Rome I Regulation, Rome II Regulation

Abstract

This comment on the judgment C-25/18 analyses the characterisation of the outstanding amounts payable by the owners of an apartment to the manager of the association of owners of the building in concept of maintenance costs of communal areas. The Court of Justice of the European Union identifies the court having jurisdiction according to Article 7(1)(a) (matters related to contract) of the Brussels I Recast Regulation and the applicable law according to Articles 4(1)(b) (provision of services). However, Article 4(1)(c) (rights in rem in immovable property) of the Rome I Regulation is not applicable.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract Views: 701
PDF : 1284
Published
2019-10-01
How to Cite
Echebarría Fernández, J. (2019). Jurisdiction and applicable law to claims related to the payment of contributions to the budget of an association of property owners for the maintenance of the communal areas of a building. Comment on the judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 8 May 2019, Brian Andrew Kerr v Pavlo Postnov and Natalia Postnova, C-25/18. CUADERNOS DE DERECHO TRANSNACIONAL, 11(2), 583-591. https://doi.org/10.20318/cdt.2019.4978
Section
Varia