Prestige and European arbitration

about the Judgment London Steam-Ship of the CJEU (case C-700/20)

Keywords: European arbitration, Regulation Brussels I recast, Arbitration clause, Arbitral award, Irreconcilable judgment, Lis pendens, Public policy

Abstract

The judgment of the CJEU accepts that, in principle, a judgment entered in terms of the award may constitute a judicial decision for the purposes of the application of Article 45.1 c/ of the Brussels I Regulation recast. However, in order to be able to effectively attain such status, the judgment must necessarily meets a series of requirements. These requirements must be appreciated in a sort of test of equivalence with respect to a “genuinely European” decision and are specified in what the CJEU has described as “two fundamental rules” of the Regulation: the relative effect of the arbitration clause and lis pendens.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract Views: 254
PDF (Español (España)) : 328
Published
2022-09-30
How to Cite
Gómez Jene, M. (2022). Prestige and European arbitration: about the Judgment London Steam-Ship of the CJEU (case C-700/20). CUADERNOS DE DERECHO TRANSNACIONAL, 14(2), 1088-1099. https://doi.org/10.20318/cdt.2022.7222
Section
Varia