Prestige and European arbitration
about the Judgment London Steam-Ship of the CJEU (case C-700/20)
Keywords:
European arbitration, Regulation Brussels I recast, Arbitration clause, Arbitral award, Irreconcilable judgment, Lis pendens, Public policy
Abstract
The judgment of the CJEU accepts that, in principle, a judgment entered in terms of the award may constitute a judicial decision for the purposes of the application of Article 45.1 c/ of the Brussels I Regulation recast. However, in order to be able to effectively attain such status, the judgment must necessarily meets a series of requirements. These requirements must be appreciated in a sort of test of equivalence with respect to a “genuinely European” decision and are specified in what the CJEU has described as “two fundamental rules” of the Regulation: the relative effect of the arbitration clause and lis pendens.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Abstract Views: 254
PDF (Español (España))
: 328
Published
2022-09-30
How to Cite
Gómez Jene, M. (2022). Prestige and European arbitration: about the Judgment London Steam-Ship of the CJEU (case C-700/20). CUADERNOS DE DERECHO TRANSNACIONAL, 14(2), 1088-1099. https://doi.org/10.20318/cdt.2022.7222
Issue
Section
Varia
Se permite que los autores de los trabajos de investigación publicados en la Revista los reproduzcan en otros sitios siempre que se haga mención de que han sido previamente publicados en Cuadernos de Derecho Transnacional (CDT).