La concreción del lugar donde se ha producido el hecho dañoso en el art. 5.3 del Reglamento 44/2001: nota a la STJCE de 16 de julio de 2009

  • Natividad Goñi Urriza
Keywords: judicial cooperation in civil and commercial matters, jurisdiction and enforcement of judgments, Regulation (EC) No 44/2001, special jurisdictions, special jurisdiction in tort, definition of the “place where the harmful event occurred”

Abstract

Judgment Zuid-Chemie BV, C-189/09, of 16th July 2009, sheds some light on a very important question for the European industry on manufacturing products. Article 5(3) of Regulation No 44/2001 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters must be interpreted as meaning that, in a dispute concerning the damage caused to an undertaking by the delivery of a contaminated chemical product which rendered unusable the fertiliser that the undertaking produces from a number of raw materials and by the processing of that product, the words ‘place where the harmful event occurred’ designate the place where the initial damage occurred as a result of the normal use of the product for the purpose for which it was intended.


Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract Views: 1412
PDF (Español (España)) : 3534
How to Cite
Goñi Urriza, N. (1). La concreción del lugar donde se ha producido el hecho dañoso en el art. 5.3 del Reglamento 44/2001: nota a la STJCE de 16 de julio de 2009. CUADERNOS DE DERECHO TRANSNACIONAL, 3(1), 290-295. Retrieved from https://e-revistas.uc3m.es/index.php/CDT/article/view/1081
Section
Varia