The judgment in the Intel case or how Competition law does not respond to the current reality

  • Aitor Zurimendi Isla Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea
DOI: https://doi.org/10.20318/cdt.2022.7210
Keywords: abuse of dominant position, burden of proof, Competition law

Abstract

The judgment of the General Court of 26.1.2022 overrides the Decision of the Commission in the Intel case and establishes a system of distribution of the burden of proof that in practice supposes a great obstacle for the Competition Authorities to stop effectively the abuse of dominant position of digital companies. This paper analyzes the sentence, the ideal model of the burden of proof system for the abuse of dominant position, and proposes its reform.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract Views: 289
PDF (Español (España)) : 391
Published
2022-09-29
How to Cite
Zurimendi Isla, A. (2022). The judgment in the Intel case or how Competition law does not respond to the current reality. CUADERNOS DE DERECHO TRANSNACIONAL, 14(2), 900-914. https://doi.org/10.20318/cdt.2022.7210
Issue
Vol. 14 No. 2 (2022)
Section
Estudios
Se permite que los autores de los trabajos de investigación publicados en la Revista los reproduzcan en otros sitios siempre que se haga mención de que han sido previamente publicados en Cuadernos de Derecho Transnacional (CDT).

Funding data