Foreign arbitral award and international public policy. The challenge

  • Carmen María Noriega Linares
DOI: https://doi.org/10.20318/cdt.2023.7581
Keywords: Arbitration Law, New York Convention, International Legal Cooperation Act, Consumers, Motivation of the award, Absence of the respondent, International Public Policy, Action for annulment, Jurisdictional equivalent, Abusive clause in arbitration, Arbitrability

Abstract

 The judicial order of the TSJ of Madrid of 5th May 2022 allows to study several key aspects to grant or deny the recognition of the arbitral award. The fact that the respondent is absent from both the arbitration proceedings and the exequatur might seem to be of importance in order to trigger international public policy, but does it really matter? Perhaps what tips the balance in favor of refusal is the position attributed to the respondent and not its presence, or maybe there are other reaons. Therefore, it is necessary to be very clear about which laws are applicable to this procedure, what differentiates it from other similar ones and what the award must contain in order for international public policy to make its appearance or not. And all this is studied in this paper.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract Views: 293
PDF (Español (España)) : 612
Published
2023-03-03
How to Cite
Noriega Linares, C. M. (2023). Foreign arbitral award and international public policy. The challenge. CUADERNOS DE DERECHO TRANSNACIONAL, 15(1), 1008-1029. https://doi.org/10.20318/cdt.2023.7581
Issue
Vol. 15 No. 1 (2023)
Section
Varia
Se permite que los autores de los trabajos de investigación publicados en la Revista los reproduzcan en otros sitios siempre que se haga mención de que han sido previamente publicados en Cuadernos de Derecho Transnacional (CDT).