Rethinking Privacy in AI Ethics. Perspectives from Feminism and Decolonial Theory
Abstract
The traditional notions of privacy in Artificial Intelligence Ethics often reflect a Western and Eurocentric perspective, limiting their applicability and relevance in non-Western contexts. work adopts a decolonial and reflective approach to explore notions of privacy from diverse cultures, communities, and peoples, challenging the dominant paradigm in AIE. Through This the incorporation of feminist perspectives and decolonial theories, it seeks a more holistic and contextual understanding of privacy that recognizes the plurality of experiences and knowledge. This approach allows for the identification of how power structures and socioeconomic conditions influence the implementation and impact of AI, emphasizing the need for an AI ethics that goes beyond technological concerns and addresses the material realities of its use.
Downloads
References
Algorithm Watch. (2020). AI Ethics Guidelines Global Inventory. Recuperado de https://inventory.algorithmwatch.org/.
Arora, P. (2019). General Data Protection Regulation—A Global Standard? Privacy Futures, Digital Activism, and Surveillance Cultures in the Global South. Surveillance & Society. doi: https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v17i5.13307.
Ausín, T. (2021). ¿Por qué ética para la Inteligencia Artificial? Lo viejo, lo nuevo y lo espurio. Sociología y Tecnociencia, 11 (Extra_2), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.24197/st.Extra_2.2021.1-16.
Awad, E., Dsouza, S., Kim, R., Schulz, J., Heinrich, J., Shariff, A., Bonnefon, J., y Rahman, I. (2018). The moral machine experiment. Nature, 563, 59-64. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0637-6.
Benhabib, S. (2002). The Claims of Culture: Equality and Diversity in the Global Era. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Cabezas, M. (2013). Juicios morales y fronteras biológicas: más allá de la frontera razón/emoción. Arbor, 189 (762). https://doi.org/10.3989/arbor.2013.762n4003.
Conger, K., Fausset, R., & Kovaleski, S. (2019). San Francisco Bans Facial Recognition Technology. The New York Times.
Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., Raja, C., Chazerand, P., Dignum, V., Luetge, C., Madelin, R., Pagallo, U., Rossi, F., Schafer, B., Valcke, P., y Vayena, E. (2018). AI4People—An Ethical Framework for a Good AI Society: Opportunities, Risks, Principles, and Recommendations. Minds & Machines, 28, pp. 689-707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5.
Fraser, N. (2009). Feminism, Capitalism, and the Cunning of History. New Left Review, 56, Mar/Abr.
Gilman, M. (2021). Feminism, Privacy, and Law in Cyberspace. The Oxford Handbook of Feminism and Law in the United States. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197519998.013.36
Hill Collins, P. (2022). Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. Routledge.
Holm, S. (1995). Not just autonomy—the principles of American biomedical ethics. Journal of Medical Ethics, 21, 332-338. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.21.6.332.
Hongladarom, S., & Bandasak, J. (2023). Non-western AI ethics guidelines: implications for intercultural ethics of technology. AI & Soc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-023-01665-6.
Jobin, A., Ienca, M., & Vayena, E. (2019). The Global Landscape of AI Ethics Guidelines. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1 (9), 389-399.
Lehohla, P. (2018). Digital Colonialism on the African Continent. Recuperado de https://ibw21.org/tech/digital-colonialism-on-the-african-continent/.
Maldonado, C. (2018). De-colonialidad en la era tecnomediática. Ediciones Ciespal.
Mathiason, J. (2023). Femtech: The “Smart” Business of Menstruation, Hormone Tracking, and the Corporate Construction of Risk. Feminist Studies, 49, pp. 118-149. doi: https://doi.org/10.1353/fem.2023.a901596
Mehrnezhad, M., Shipp, L., Almeida, T., & Toreini, E. (2022). Vision: Too Little too Late? Do the Risks of FemTech already Outweigh the Benefits? Proceedings of the 2022 European Symposium on Usable Security. doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/3549015.3554204
Moller Okin, S. (2023). Justice, Gender, And the Family. Basic Books.
Munro, M., & Madigan, R. (1993). Privacy in the Private Sphere. Housing Studies, 8(1), pp. 29-45. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02673039308720748
Nissenbaum, H. (2010). Privacy in Context: Technology, Policy, and the Integrity of Social Life. Stanford University Press.
Okeke Chimakonam, J. (2017). African philosophy and global epistemic injustice. Journal of Global Ethics, 13 (2), 120-137. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449626.2017.1364660.
Piedra, J. (2022). Venditio fumi: Autorregulación Empresarial e Inteligencia Artificial. Sincronía, AñoXXVI(81). doi: https://doi.org/10.32870/sincronia.axxvi.n81.12a22.
Piedra, J. (2023a). Decolonizing the 'Ethics Of AI'. Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy, 19 (1).
Piedra, J.(2023b). Gobernanza ética de datos en la Administración Pública: Comentarios a partir del caso UPAD en Costa Rica. Revista Administración Pública y Sociedad.
Piedra, J. (2023c). La Recopilación de Datos Biométricos en Costa Rica: Controversias Éticas a Partir del Proyecto de Ley Nº 21321. Revista Enfoques: Ciencia Política y Administración Pública, 21 (38), 23-49.
Quijano, A. (2007). Colonialidad del poder y clasificación social. En S. Castro-Gómez, GRosfoguel. (Eds.), El giro decolonial: Reflexiones para una diversidad epistémica más allá del capitalismo global. Iesco-Pensar-Siglo del Hombre Editores.
Roberts, J. S., & Montoya, L. N. (2022). Decolonisation, Global Data Law, and Indigenous Data Sovereignty. ArXiv. doi: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2208.04700
Roberts, J. S., & Montoya, L. N. (2023). In Consideration of Indigenous Data Sovereignty: Data Mining as a Colonial Practice. ArXiv. doi: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2309.10215
Roth, L. (1999). The Right to Privacy Is Political: Power, the Boundary Between Public and Private, and Sexual Harassment. Law & Social Inquiry, 24 (1), 45-71. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.1999.tb00792.x
Stacheli, L. A. (1996). Publicity, Privacy, and Women's Political Action. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 14(6), pp. 601-619. doi:10.1068/d140601
Trull, M. E. (2013). Performing Privacy and Early Modern Women. Palgrave Macmillan UK. doi: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137282996_1
Véliz, C. (2020). Privacidad es poder. Datos, vigilancia y libertad en la era digital. España: Debate.
Walsh, C. (2007). ¿Son Posibles Unas Ciencias Sociales/culturales Otras? Reflexiones En Torno a Las Epistemologías Decoloniales. Nómadas, 26, 102–113.
Woolf, V. (2012). Una habitación propia. Alianza Editorial.
Young, I. (1990). Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton University Press.
Zuboff, S. (2020). La era del capitalismo de la vigilancia: la lucha por un futuro humano frente a las nuevas fronteras del poder. Ediciones Paidós.
Eunomía. Revista en Cultura de la Legalidad is a duly registered journal, with EISSN 2253-6655.
The articles published in Eunomía are –unless indicated otherwise– under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivative Works 3.0 Spain license. You can copy, distribute and communicate them publicly as long as you cite their author and the journal and institution that publishes them and do not make derivative works with them. The full license can be consulted at: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/es/deed.es
