Redating of Mark, Matthewand the “Little Apocalypse” of the Didaje
Keywords:
Mark, Matthew, Didache, “Little Apocalypses”, Decapolis, Pliny
Abstract
Traditionally, Mark is dated around 70 A.D., Matthew around 80 A.D. and Didache around 100 A.D. Recent reserches have suggested that, really, Matthew is the one who depends on Didache. In this paper, it is analysed the litterary dependences between the “Little Apocalypses” of Mark, Matthew and Didache. Also, it is studied the litterary relationships bettween Mark and the description of Judaea in the Pliny’s Natural History. These evidences, beside a number of old arguments retested, delay a decade the date of Mark and, consequently, the date of Matthew, while Didache, at least in its earliest strata of composition, is raised as one of the oldest Jewishchristian texts.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Abstract Views: 583
PDF (Español (España))
: 1407
Published
2019-07-12
How to Cite
Giménez de Aragón Sierra, P. (2019). Redating of Mark, Matthewand the “Little Apocalypse” of the Didaje. ARYS, (10), 163-190. Retrieved from https://e-revistas.uc3m.es/index.php/ARYS/article/view/4850
Issue
Section
Monographic
Authors retain the copyright of their texts, and full publishing rights without restrictions.
Since 2021, the documents include the Creative Commons 4.0 license: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Previous documents include the Creative Commons 3.0: Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works license (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0)