The Representation of False Prophets in Polemical Discourses
A Comparative Analysis
Abstract
In this article, I analyse some “transversal” polemical motifs (adopted by both “pagans” and Christians) in the representation of Alexander of Abonouteichos, offered in the homonymous work by Lucian of Samosata, and in the description of the Montanists in heresiological sources, focusing in particular on the polemists who are quoted by Eusebius of Caesarea. This analysis attempts to highlight how, despite the differences between the mentioned authors, it is possible to find some common points in the representation of the “false prophets” that is often due to the same literary references. In particular, I analyse the way of presenting the life and behaviour of these characters and their way of delivering prophetic messages.
Downloads
References
Africa, Thomas (1982). Worms and the Death of Kings. A Cautionary Note on Disease and History. Classical Antiquity, 1.1, pp. 1-17.
Amandry, Pierre (1950). La mantique apollinienne à Delphes. Essai sur le fonctionnement de l’oracle. Paris: de Boccard.
Aune, David E. (1983). Prophecy in Early Christianity and the Ancient Mediterranean World. Grand Rapids: W.B. Eerdmans Publishing Company.
Bertani, Francesco (2020). Platone e gli indovini selvaggi: ragioni e termini di una polemica. Rhesis, 11.1, pp. 105-114.
Bettini, Maurizio (2014). Elogio del politeismo. Quello che possiamo imparare dalle religioni antiche. Bologna: Il Mulino.
Birley, Anthony R. (2005). The Roman Government of Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bouvier, David & Dasen, Véronique (eds.) (2020). Héraclite: le temps est un enfant qui joue. Liège: Presses Universitaires de Liège.
Bracht Branham, Robert (1989). Unruly Eloquence. Lucian and the Comedy of Traditions. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Dell’Isola, Maria (2017). Montanism and Ecstasy. The Case of Theodotus’ Death (Eus., HE V 16, 14-15). In Destro & Pesce, 2017, pp. 377-394.
Dell’Isola, Maria (2020a). L’ultima profezia. La crisi montanista nel cristianesimo antico. Trapani: Il pozzo di Giacobbe.
Dell’Isola, Maria (2020b). “They Are Not the Words of a Rational Man”. Ecstatic Prophecy in Montanism. In Gasparini et al., 2020, pp. 71-86.
Deriu, Morena (2017). Mixis e Poikilia nei protagonisti della satira. Studi sugli archetipi comico e platonico nei dialoghi di Luciano di Samosata. Trento: Università degli Studi di Trento.
Destro, Adriana & Pesce, Mauro (eds.) (2017). Texts, Practices, and Groups. Multidisciplinary Approaches to the History of Jesus Followers in the First Two Centuries. Turnhout: Brepols.
Dickie, Matthew (2004). Divine Epiphany in Lucian’s Account of the Oracle of Alexander of Abonuteichos. Illinois Classical Studies, 29, pp. 159-182.
Filoramo, Giovanni (ed.) (2003). Carisma profetico. Fattore di innovazione religiosa. Brescia: Morcelliana.
Forbes, Christopher 1995. Prophecy and Inspired Speech in Early Christianity and Its Hellenistic Environment. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr.
Gasparini, Valentino et al. (eds.) (2020). Lived Religion in the Ancient Mediterranean World. Approaching Religious Transformations from Archaeology, History and Classics. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter.
Gerolemou, Maria (ed.) (2018). Recognizing Miracles in Antiquity and Beyond. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter.
Holl, Karl (1980). Epiphanius, Panarion haer. 34-64. Berlin: De Gruyter (first ed. Leipzig 1922).
Ierodiakonou, Katerina & Krapinger, Gernot (2002). Widerlegung. In Der Neue Pauly. Enzyklopädie der Antike, vol. 12.2. Stuttgart-Weimar: Verlag J.B. Metzler, p. 506.
Iricinschi, Eduard & Zellentin, Holger M. (eds.) (2008a). Heresy and Identity in Late Antiquity. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
Iricinschi, Eduard & Zellentin, Holger M. (2008b). Making Selves and Making Others. Identity and Late Antique Heresio-logies. In Iricinschi & Zellentin, 2008, pp. 1-27.
Käppel, Lutz 2000. Podaleirios. In Der Neue Pauly. Enzyklopädie der Antike, vol. 9, Stuttgart-Weimar: Verlag J.B. Metzler, p. 1186.
Kim, Young R. (2010). Reading the “Panarion” as Collective Biography. The Heresiarch as Unholy Man. Vigiliae Christianae, 64.4, pp. 382-413.
Kokkini, Dimitra (2013). The Rejection of Erotic Passion by Euripides’ Hippolytos. In Sanders, 2019, pp. 67-83.
Lake, Kirsopp (1965). Eusebius. Ecclesiastical History, Volume I: Books 1-5. Cambridge, MA & London: Harvard University Press (first ed. 1926).
Lampe, Geoffrey W.H. (1961). A Patristic Greek Lexicon. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Le Boulluec, Alain (1985). La notion d’hérésie dans la littérature grecque, II-III siècles (vol. 1). Paris: Études Augustiniennes.
Longo, Vincenzo (1986). Dialoghi di Luciano. Volume Secondo. Torino: UTET.
Macleod, Matthew D. (1993). Luciani Opera Tomus II: Libelli 26-43. Oxford: Clarendon Press (first ed. 1972).
Massa, Francesco (2020). Des dieux qui jouent : polémiques religieuses autour du fr. 52 D.-K. d’Héraclite dans l’Empire romain. In Bouvier & Dasen, 2020, pp. 27-45.
Nagy, Agnes (2009). Qui a peur du cannibale ? Récits antiques d’anthropophages aux frontières de l’humanité. Turnhout: Brepols.
ní Mheallaigh, Karen (2018). Lucian’s Alexander. Technoprophecy, thaumatology and the poetics of wonder. In Gerolemou, 2018, pp. 225-256.
Norelli, Enrico (2003). Parole di profeti, parole sui profeti. La costruzione del Montanismo nei frammenti dell’Anonimo antimontanista (Eusebio di Cesarea, Storia ecclesiastica 5,16-17). In Filoramo, 2003, pp. 107-132.
Norelli, Enrico (2013). Presenza e persistenza dei ruoli carismatici. Il caso delle assemblee sul Montanismo nel II secolo. Ricerche Storico Bibliche, 25, pp. 165-195.
Pålsson, Katarina (2021). Negotiating Heresy. The Reception of Origen in Jerome’s Exhatological Thought. Münster: Aschendorff Verlag.
Panayotakis, Stelios et al. (eds.) (2015). Holy Men and Charlatans in the Ancient Novel. Eelde & Groningen: Barkhuis.
Perea Yébenes, Sabino (2012). Guerra y religión. Luciano, el oráculo de Alejandro de Abonuteico y las derrotas de Sedatio Severiano contra los partos y de Marco Aurelio contra cuados y marcomanos. Studia Historica. Historia Antigua, 30, pp. 71-113.
Pesce, Mauro (2014). La relazione tra il concetto di eresia e la storia del cristianesimo. Annali di Storia dell’Esegesi, 31.1, pp. 151-168.
Pesce, Mauro (2018). Il cristianesimo, Gesù e la modernità. Roma: Carocci.
Pisano, Carmine (2017). The Visionary’s Body as a Dialectical Space of Tradition. The Case of the Pythia. In Destro & Pesce, 2017, pp. 413-431.
Pozzi, Stefano (2003). Sull’attendibilità del narratore nell’“Alexander” di Luciano. Prometheus, 29.2, pp. 129-150.
Ramelli, Ilaria L.E. (2005). Tracce di montanismo nel “Peregrino” di Luciano?. Aevum, 79.1, pp. 79-94.
Ramelli, Ilaria L.E. (2015). Lucian’s Peregrinus as holy man and charlatan and the construction of the contrast between holy men and charlatans in the “Acts of Mari”. In Panayotakis et al., 2015, pp. 105-120.
Samad, Joy (2010). Is greed good? An interpretation of Plato’s “Hipparchus”. Polis. The Journal for Ancient Greek and Roman Political Thought, 27.1, pp. 25-37.
Sanders, Ed (ed.) (2019). Erôs and the Polis. Love in Context. London: Institute of Classical Studies.
Sarefield, Daniel (2020). “To the Ravens”. Curses from the Oracle of Abonouteichos. Acta Antiqua Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, 60.3-4, pp. 417-427.
Schwartz, Eduard (1906). Eusebius, Kirchengeschichte I. Leipzig: J.C. Hinrichssche Buchhandlung.
Spampinato, Gaetano (2021). Profeti, martiri e “ipocriti”. Funzioni e ruoli sociali nel montanismo delle origini. Annali di Storia dell’Esegesi, 38.1, pp. 161-184.
Tripaldi, Daniele (2017). Lots, Cups, and Ectasy. Towards a Reconstruction of the “Thiasoi” of Marcus, Disciple of Valentinus. In Destro & Pesce, 2017, pp. 361-375.
Thonemann, Peter (2021). Lucian. Alexander or The False Prophet. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Urciuoli, Emiliano R. (2021). La religione urbana. Come la città ha prodotto in cristianesimo. Bologna: Dehoniane.
Victor, Ulrich (1997). Lukian von Samosata. Alexandros oder der Lügenprophet. Leiden & Boston: Brill.
Wagemakers, Bart (2010). Incest, Infanticide, and Cannibalism. Anti-Christian Imputations in the Roman Empire. Greece & Rome, 57.2, pp. 337-354.
Williams, Frank (2013). The Panarion of Epiphanius of Salamis. Books II and III. De Fide. Leiden & Boston: Brill.
Copyright (c) 2023 Gaetano Spampinato
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their texts, and full publishing rights without restrictions.
Since 2021, the documents include the Creative Commons 4.0 license: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Previous documents include the Creative Commons 3.0: Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works license (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0)
