El concepto de orden público internacional y el derecho a un proceso justo. Nota a la STJCE de 2 de abril de 2009

  • Antonia Durán Ayago
Keywords: extraterritorial effects of foreign decisions, resolution, international public policy, right to a fair process, rights of defense, right to be been heard

Abstract

The ECJ should elucidate if, on the base of the clause of public policy established in the article 27.1 CBr, the judge of the addressed State can take into account the fact that the judge of the State of origin has been pronounced on the pretensions of the claimant, without hearing to the defendant that it had duly appeared before him but was excluded of the procedure via a resolution, for not having certain compliment imposed obligations via an adopted resolution previously within the framework of the same procedure.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract Views: 1417
PDF (Español (España)) : 3471
Published
2010-10-08
How to Cite
Durán Ayago, A. (2010). El concepto de orden público internacional y el derecho a un proceso justo. Nota a la STJCE de 2 de abril de 2009. CUADERNOS DE DERECHO TRANSNACIONAL, 2(2), 250-256. Retrieved from https://e-revistas.uc3m.es/index.php/CDT/article/view/127
Section
Varia