Forum Societatis revisited: commentary to the ECJ Judgment of 7 march 2018, c-560/16, e.On

  • Ángel María Ballesteros Barros
Keywords: Article 22(2) of Regulation (EC) No 44/2001, exclusive jurisdiction, disputes relating to the validity of decisions of the company’s organs, scope

Abstract

ECJ Judgment of 7 March 2018, C-560/16, E.ON, clarify the scope of application of Ar­ticle 22(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001. The Court held that Article 22.2 must be interpreted as meaning that an action, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, for review of the reasonableness of the consideration that the principal shareholder of a company is required to pay to the minority sha­reholders of that company in the event of the compulsory transfer of their shares to that principal share­holder comes within the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of the Member State in which that company is established. The author of this article disagrees with the reasoning used by the ECJ and proposes a different solution to the characterization of the action in the main proceedings.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract Views: 483
PDF (Español (España)) : 508
Published
2018-10-05
How to Cite
Ballesteros Barros, Ángel M. (2018). Forum Societatis revisited: commentary to the ECJ Judgment of 7 march 2018, c-560/16, e.On. CUADERNOS DE DERECHO TRANSNACIONAL, 10(2), 811-820. https://doi.org/10.20318/cdt.2018.4403
Section
Varia