Ethical responsibility
Abstract
In this paper Aramayo attempts to demarcate the specific moral sphere of responsibility, hence he underlines its basic features for distinguishing moral from legal, political, even psychoanalytical forms of responsibility. Along this route, Aramayo appeals to Manuel Cruz and Javier Muguerza dialogues and requests the guidance of a classic thinker as Kant whose conception is compared with that of Hans Jonas. Finally, he concludes this work with the analysis of Weber’s distinction between convictions and responsibilities.
Downloads
Eunomía. Revista en Cultura de la Legalidad is a duly registered journal, with EISSN 2253-6655.
The articles published in Eunomía are –unless indicated otherwise– under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivative Works 3.0 Spain license. You can copy, distribute and communicate them publicly as long as you cite their author and the journal and institution that publishes them and do not make derivative works with them. The full license can be consulted at: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/es/deed.es