La irredimible impersonalidad de la responsabilidad. Comentario a Adscripción y reacción de Sebastián Figueroa

Keywords: Responsibility, moral responsibility, legal responsibility, language, interpretation

Abstract

In the first section of Adscripción y reacción, Sebastián Figueroa attempts to disambiguate the uses of the idea of responsibility, the relations among these uses and the problems that arise from those relations. In this comment I first offer observations and questions to this proposed organization. Then I offer a general comment about the distinction between legal and moral responsibility proposed by the author, where the first is presented as being impersonal, while the second would be personal. Against what I take to be his view, I argue that all forms of responsibility entail an experience of simplification and submission to a human but external framework of meaning. Every kind of responsibility is shaped and expressed through language and language is generally not a means of self-expression for individuals but rather a space they must inhabit despite themselves. Every interaction where there is a normative interpretation through language is therefore impersonal, and the idea that there would be some more impersonal than others remain mysterious.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract Views: 142
PDF (Español (España)) : 140

References

Althusser, L. (2012). Ideology and ideological state apparatuses (notes towards an investigation). En M. Durham y D. Kellner (Eds.), Media and Cultural Studies: Keyworks (80-86) Wiley-Blackwell.

Butler, J. (2005). Giving an account of oneself. Fordham University Press.

Díaz y García, M. (1991). La Autoría en Derecho Penal. PPU.

Figueroa, S. (2019). Adscripción y reacción. Marcial Pons.

Gorriz, E. (2008). El Concepto de Autor en el Derecho Penal. Tirant lo Blanch.

Guzmán, J.L. (2014). El concepto de autor en el estatuto de Roma y su aplicación en la primera sentencia de la Corte Penal Internacional: un dilema metodológico. En K. Ambos, E. Malarino y C. Steiner (Eds.), Análisis de la primera sentencia de la Corte Penal Internacional: el caso Lubanga (231.261). Colección Konrad Adenahuer.

Glissant, É. (1997). Poetics of Relation. University of Michigan Press.

Hart, H. L. A. (1967) Varieties of responsibility. Law Quarterly Review, 83, 346-364.

Roxin, C. (2000). Las formas de intervención en el delito: estado de la cuestión. En C. Roxin, B. Schünemann, G. Jakobs, W. Frisch y M. Kohler (Eds.), Sobre el Estado de la Teoría del Delito (155-178). Civitas.

Žižek, S. (2016). Language, violence and nonviolence. International Journal of Žižek Studies, 2 (3).

Published
2022-09-16
How to Cite
Lorca Ferreccio, R. (2022). La irredimible impersonalidad de la responsabilidad. Comentario a Adscripción y reacción de Sebastián Figueroa. EUNOMÍA. Revista En Cultura De La Legalidad, (23), 443-453. https://doi.org/10.20318/eunomia.2022.7136
Section
Reading Corner. Book Forum