Empathy (Political Emotion)
Abstract
This article presents the state of the art on the concept of empathy as a tool for the field of morality and politics. It will begin by giving an account of the reasons that have led us to speak of empathy since the beginning of the 21st century, showing the elements for and against its moral use and the kind of social relationships it promotes. After having shown that empathy is not really an emotion but a mechanism of affective communication, it will end with a brief assessment that (a) recognises that, although it is common to adopt the concept of empathy together with notions of justice (to soften rational argumentation), empathy implies a completely different world from the one our conceptions of justice are usually used, and (b) that the process of empathy, although it may start as a “natural affection”, needs an voluntary effort of fine-tuning and education.
Downloads
References
Ahmed, S. (2004). The Cultural Politics of Emotion. Edinburgh University Press.
Ahmed, S. (2010). The Promise of Happiness. Duke University Press.
Altuna, B. (2018). Empatía y moralidad: las dimensiones psicológicas y filosóficas de una relación compleja. Revista de Filosofía, 43 (2), 245-262. http://dx.doi.org/10.5209/RESF.62029
Baron-Cohen, S. (2011). Zero Degrees of Empathy. Penguin Books.
Batson, C. (1991). The Altruism Question. Towards a Social-Psychological Answer. Psychology Press.
Bernhart, B. y Singer, T. (2012). The Neural Basis of empathy. Annual Review of Neurosciences, 35 (1), pp. 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-neuro-062111-150536
Bloom, P. (2016). Against Empathy. The Case for Rational Compassion. Penguin Random House.
Boler, M. (1999). Feeling Power. Emotions and Education. Routledge.
Burke, M., Kuzmicová, A., Mangen, A. y Schilhab, Th. (2016). Empathy at the confluence of neuroscience and empirical literary studies. Scientific Study of Literature, 6 (1), 6-41. https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.6.1.03bur
Clohesy, A.M. (2013). Politics of Empathy. Routledge.
D’Arms, J. (1999). Empathy and Evaluative Inquiry. Chicago-Kent Law Review, 74 (4), 1467-1500. https://scholarship.kentlaw.iit.edu/cklawreview/vol74/iss4/4
Decety, J. (2011). Empathy. From Bench to Bedside. The MIT Press.
Decety, J., Michalska, K. J. y Kinzler, K. D. (2012). The Contribution of Emotion and Cognition to Moral Sensitivity: a Neurodevelopment Moral Study. Cerebral Cortex, 22(1), 209-220. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhr111
Decety, J. y Cowell, J. M. (2014). The Complex Relation between Morality and Empathy. Trends in Cognitive Science, 18 (7), pp. 337-339.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2014.04.008
Fagiano, M. (2019). Relational Empathy. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 27(2), 162-179. https://doi.org/10.1080/09672559.2019.1598086
Goldman, A. I. (2006). Simulating Minds The Philosophy, Psychology, and Neuroscience of Mindreading. Oxford University Press.
Hauser, M. (2006). What’s Fair? The Unconscious Calculus of our Moral. En VV.AA., Empathy and Fairness (89-96). Novartis Foudation. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470030585.ch4
Hoffman, M. L. (2000). Empathy and Moral Development: Implications for Caring and Justice. Cambridge University Press. (Desarrollo moral y empatía, Idea Books, 2002).
Hume, D. (1888). A Treatise of Human Nature, Clarendon Press (D. Hume, Tratado de la naturaleza humana, Editora Nacional 1981).
Jensen, R. T. y Moran, D. (2012). Introduction: intersubjectivity and empathy. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 11, pp. 125-133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-012-9258-y
Kauppinen, A. (2013). Empathy, Emotion Regulation, and Moral Judgment. En H. Maibom (Ed.), Empathy and Morality (97-121). Oxford University Press.
Lacoboni, M. (2009). Mirroring People: The New Science of How We Connect with Others. Picador.
Maibom, H. (2013). Introduction: Everything you ever wanted to know about empathy. En H. Maibom (Ed.), Empathy and Morality (1-40). Oxford University Press.
Matravers, D. (2017). Empathy. Key Concepts in Philosophy. Polity Press.
May, J. y Kumar, V. (2018). Moral Reasoning and Emotion. En A. Zimmerman, K. Jones y M. Timmons (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Moral Reasoning (139-157). Routledge.
Mesquita, B. (2022). Between Us. How Culture Create Emotions. W.W. Norton.
Misselhorn, C. (2023). Seeing Others as Ends in Themselves. From the Empathic to the Moral Point of View. En Th. Petraschka & Ch.Werner (Eds.), Empathy’s Role in Understanding Persons, Literature, and Art (65-84). Routledge.
Pinker, S. (2012). Los ángeles que llevamos dentro. Paidós.
Pizarro, D. (2000). Nothing More than Feelings? The Role of Emotions in Moral Judgment. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 30 (4), 355-375. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5914.00135
Prinz, J. (2011). Against Empathy. The Southern Journal of Philosophy, 49 (1), 214-233. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-6962.2011.00069.x
Rifkin, J. (2010). The Empathic Civilization: The Race to a Global Consciousness in a World of Crisis. Polity Press.
Schmetkamp, S. y Vendrell Ferran, I. (2020). Introduction: Empathy, Fiction, and Imagination. Topoi, 39, pp. 743-749. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-019-09664-3
Scudder, M. (2016). Beyond Empathy: Strategies and Ideals of Democratic Deliberation. Polity, 48 (4), 524-550. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41279-016-0001-9
Slote, M. (2007). The Ethics of Care and Empathy. Routledge.
Slote, M. (2010). Moral Sentimentalism. Oxford University Press.
Spaulding, S. (2023). Empathy Skills and Habits. En Th. Petraschka & Ch.Werner (Eds.), Empathy’s Role in Understanding Persons, Literature, and Art (25-43). Routledge.
Stueber, K. R. (2011). Moral Approval and the Dimensions of Empathy. Analytic Philosophy, 52 (4), 328-336. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2153-960x.2011.00540.x
Vignemont, F. (2006). When do we Empathize? En G. Bock & J. Goode (Eds.), Empathy and Fairness (181-196). Novartis Foundation.
Vignemont, F. y Singer, T. (2006). The Empathic Brain: how, when and why? Trends in Cognitive Science, 10 (10), pp. 435-441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.08.008
Eunomía. Revista en Cultura de la Legalidad is a duly registered journal, with EISSN 2253-6655.
The articles published in Eunomía are –unless indicated otherwise– under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivative Works 3.0 Spain license. You can copy, distribute and communicate them publicly as long as you cite their author and the journal and institution that publishes them and do not make derivative works with them. The full license can be consulted at: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/es/deed.es