The Many Lovers of Gain
The Pseudo-platonic Hipparchus and the Fourth-century BCE Debate on the Pursuit of Self-interest
Abstract
This article deals with the interpretation of Hipparchus and the question to which extent its advocacy of φιλοκέρδεια or the love of gain should be read ironically. It argues that this pseudo-Platonic dialogue can be best understood in the context of a broader fourth-century philosophical debate on the pursuit of (economic) self-interest. First, I show how the Hipparchus comments on and develops thoughts from Plato’s Republic. Then, I demonstrate how the re-evaluation of the love of gain compares to Xenophon’s treatment of φιλοκέρδεια, κέρδος, and πλεονεξία in the Oeconomicus and Cyropaedia, which also respond to the Republic, and show how both authors provocatively re-evaluate these negative notions of gain or self-interest into neutral ones. These comparisons inform a layered reading, in which the apparent irony helps readers to reflect on the proposed re-evaluation of commerce.
Downloads
References
Adkins, A. (1960), Merit and Responsibility: A Study in Greek Values, Oxford.
Algra, K.A. (1994), «Observations on Plato’s Thrasymachus: The Case for Pleonexia», in K.A. Algra, P.W. Van der Horst, D.T. Runia (eds.), Polyhistor: Studies in the History and Historiography of Ancient Philosophy, Presented to Jaap Mansfeld on his Sixtieth Birthday, Leiden, 41-59.
Aronadio, F. (2008), Platone, Dialoghi , V. Dialoghi spuri di Platone , Torino.
Arruzza, C. (2018), A Wolf in the City: Tyranny and Tyrants in Plato’s Republic, Oxford.
Balot, R.K. (2001), Greed and Injustice in Classical Athens, Princeton.
Berkel, T.A. van (2018), «Socratic economics and the psychology of money», in G. Danzig, D. Johnson, D. Morrison (eds.), Plato and Xenophon: comparative studies, Leiden-Boston.
Berkel, T.A. van (2020), The Economics of Friendship. Conceptions of Reciprocity in Classical Greece, Leiden-Boston.
Bloom, A. (1987), «On Platos Hipparchus the Political Philosopher in Democratic Society», in T. Pangle (ed.), The Roots of Political Philosophy. Ten Forgotten Socratic Dialogues, Ithaca-London, 32-52.
Böckh, A. (1806), In Platonis qui vulgo fertur Minoem eiusdemque libros priores de Legibus commentatio, Halle an der Saale.
Brisson, L. (2014), Écrits attribués à Platon, Paris.
Catana, L. (2021), «Two Theories of Natural Justice in Plato’s Gorgias », Elenchos 42, 209-228.
Cozzo, A. (1988), Kerdos: semantica, ideologie e società nella Grecia antica , Roma.
Danzig, G. (2003), «Why Socrates was not a Farmer: Xenophon’s Oeconomicus as a Philosophical Dialogue», Greece and Rome 50, 57-76.
Danzig, G. (2006), «Intra-Socratic Polemics: The Symposia of Plato and Xenophon», Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies 45, 331-357.
Danzig, G. (2009), «Big Boys and Little Boys: Justice and Law in Xenophon’s Cyropaedia and Memorabilia », Polis 26, 271-295.
Danzig, G. (2012), «The Best of the Achaemenids: Benevolence, Self-interest and the “ironic” reading of Cyropaedia », in F. Hobden, C. Tuplin (eds.), Xenophon: Ethical Principles and Historical Enquiry, Leiden, 499-540.
Danzig, G. (2018), «Introduction to the Comparative Study of Plato and Xenophon», in G. Danzig, D. Johnson, D. Morrison (eds.), Plato and Xenophon: Comparative Studies. Leiden-Boston, 1-30.
Davis, M. (2006), «Making Something from Nothing: On Plato’s Hipparchus », The Review of Politics 68, 547-563.
Dentsoras, D. (2019), «Virtue and Proper Use in Plato’s Euthydemus and Stoicism», Peitho. Examina Antiqua 1, 45-64.
Dorion, L.A. (2008), «Socrate oikonomikos », in M. Narcy, A. Tordesillas (eds), Xénophon et Socrate: Actes du colloque d’Aix-en-Provence (6-9 novembre 2003), Paris.
Dorion, L.A. (2018), «Fundamental Parallels Between Socrates’ and Ischomachus’ Positions in the Oeconomicus », in A. Stavru, C. Moore (eds.), Socrates and the Socratic dialogue, Leiden-New York, 421-543.
Finley, M.I. (1973), The Ancient Economy, Berkeley-Los Angeles.
Frank, J. (2018), Poetic Justice. Rereading Plato’s Republic, Chicago.
Gray, V.J. (2011), Xenophon’s Mirror of Princes: Reading the Reflections, Oxford.
Helmer, É. (2021), Oikonomia. Philosophie Grecque de l’Economie, Paris.
Helmer, É. (forthcoming), «Debating the Legitimacy of Trade in Xenophon’s Economics 20, 22-29», in F. Pentassuglio, C. Balla (eds.), Socratica V (Proceedings of the International Society for Socratic Studies).
Higgins, W.E. (1977), Xenophon the Athenian: The Problem of the Individual and the Society of the Polis, New York.
Hinsch, M. (2021), Ökonomik und Hauswirtschaft im klassischen Griechenland , Stuttgart.
Jażdżewska, K. (2022), Greek Dialogue in Antiquity: Post-Platonic Transformations, Oxford.
Johnson, D.M. (2021), Xenophon’s Socratic Works, Abingdon-New York.
Jong, I.J.F. de (1987), «Beiträge aus dem Hamburger Thesaurus Graecae Linguae I: Homeric κέρδος and ὄφελος», Museum Helveticum 64, 79-81.
Joyal, M. (2019), «What is Socratic about the Pseudo-Platonica?», in C. Moore (ed.), Brill’s Companion to the Reception of Socrates, Leiden-Boston, 211-236.
Kahn, C.H. (1998), Plato and the Socratic Dialogue, Cambridge.
Lamb, W.R.M. (1955), Charmides - Alcibiades I and II - Hipparchus - The Lovers – Theages - Minos - Epinomis , London-New York.
Ledger, G.R. (1989), Recounting Plato. A Computer Analysis of Plato’s Style, Oxford.
Leese, M. (2017), «Kapêloi and Economic Rationality in Fourth-Century B.C.E. Athens», Illinois Classical Studies 42, 41-59.
Leese, M. (2021), Making Money in Ancient Athens, Oxford.
Lévystone, D.X. (2022), «Dioecismo y Ciudad Ideal Acerca de la República de Platón, VII 540e 4-541a 1,» Journal of Ancient Philosophy 16, 1-26.
Markle, M.M. (1985), «Jury Pay and Assembly Pay at Athens», History of Political Thought 6, 265-297.
Massaro, D, Tusa Massaro, L. (1997), Platone, Ipparco, Milano.
Miller, W. (1914), Xenophon, V-VI, Cambridge MA-London.
Mulroy, D. (2007), «The Subtle Artistry of the Minos and the Hipparchus », Transactions of the American Philological Association 137, 115-131.
Nadon, C. (2001), Xenophon’s Prince: Republic and Empire in the Cyropaedia, Berkeley.
Nielsen, K.M. (2019), «The Tyrant’s Vice: Pleonexia and Lawlessness in Plato’s Republic», Philosophical Perspectives 33, 146-169.
Ober, J. (2015), The Rise and Fall of Classical Greece, Princeton.
Ober, J. (2022), The Greeks and the Rational. The Discovery of Practical Reason, Berkeley.
Parks, M.H. (2018), «If You’ll Be My Bodyguard: Simonides the Mercenary in Xenophon’s Hieron», The Classical Journal 113, 385-410.
Plax, M.J. (2005), «Profit and Envy: The Hipparchus», Polis 24, 85-108.
Pomeroy, S.B. (1994), Xenophon, Oeconomicus, Cambridge.
Reichel, M. (2010), «Xenophon’s Cyropaedia and the Hellenistic Novel», in V.J. Gray (ed.), Xenophon , Oxford, 418-438.
Roisman, H.M. (1990), «Kerdion in the Iliad : profit and trickiness», Transactions of the American Philological Association 120, 23-35.
Samad, J. (2010), «Is Greed Good? An Interpretation of Plato’s Hipparchus », Polis 27, 25-37.
Schleiermacher, F. (1855), Platons Werke, Berlin.
Schorn, S. (2005), «Der historische Mittelteil des pseudoplatonischen Hipparchos », in K. Döring, M. Erler, S. Schorn (eds.), Pseudoplatonica: Akten des Kongresses zu den Pseudoplatonica vom 6.-9. Juli 2003 im Bamberg , Stuttgart, 225-254.
Schubert, C. (2018), Platon, Hipparchos, Göttingen.
Scrofani, F. (2021), «Les dialogues apocryphes comme exégèses des dialogues authentiques? Une lecture de l’Hipparque à la lumière du Minos», Études platoniciennes 16 (online).
Sermamoglou-Soulmaidi, G. (2014), Playful Philosophy and Serious Sophistry: A Reading of Plato’s Euthydemus, Berlin.
Shaver, R. (2023), «Egoism», in E.N. Zalta, U. Nodelman (eds.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2023 Edition), online: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2023/entries/egoism/
Shorey, P. (1969), Plato in Twelve Volumes, V-VI, Cambridge MA-London.
Stevens, J.A. (1994), «Friendship and profit in Xenophon’s Oeconomicus», in P.A. Vander Waerdt (ed.), The Socratic Movement , Ithaca, 209-237.
Strauss, L. (1970), Xenophon’s Socratic Discourse: an Interpretation of the Oeconomicus, Ithaca.
Tamiolaki, M. (2017), «Xenophon’s Cyropaedia: Tentative Answers to an Enigma», in M.A. Flower (ed.), Cambridge Companion to Xenophon, Cambridge, 174-194.
Tamiolaki, M. (2018), «Being or Appearing Virtuous? The Challenges of Leadership in Xenophon’s Cyropaedia », in A. Kampakoglou, A.A. Novakhatko (eds.), Gaze, Vision, and Visuality in Ancient Greek Literature, Berlin-Boston, 308-330.
Tarrant, H, Roberts, T. (2012), «Report on the working vocabulary of the doubtful dialogues», in M. Johnson, H. Tarrant (eds.), Alcibiades and the Socratic lover-educator, London, 223-236.
Tarrant, H. (2018), «The Socratic Dubia», in A. Stavru, C. Moore (eds.), Socrates and the Socratic dialogue, Leiden-Boston, 386-411.
Tipton, J.A. (1999), «Love of Gain, Philosophy and Tyranny. A Commentary on Plato’s Hipparchus », Interpretation 26, 201-216.
Vandiver, J. (2014), «Xenophon contra Plato: Citizen Motivation and Socratic Biography», Polis 31, 74-102.
Velthoven, B.R.W. van (2023), «Φιλοκέρδεια in de pseudoplatoonse Hipparchus », Frons 43, 32-36.
Weiss, R. (2007), «Wise Guys and Smart Alecks in Republic 1 and 2», in G.R.F. Ferrari (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Plato’s Republic, Cambridge, 90-115.
Zuolo, F. (2018), «Xenophon’s Hiero. Hiding Socrates to reform Tyranny», in A. Stavru, C. Moore (eds.), Socrates and the Socratic dialogue, Leiden-Boston, 564-576.
Se permite que los autores de los artículos y de las discusiones publicados en la revista los reproduzcan en otros sitios siempre y cuando se haga mención de que han sido previamente publicados en ΠΗΓΗ/FONS.
Funding data
-
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Grant numbers NWO VI.Vidi.191.205;From Homo Economicus to Political Animal. Human self-understanding in ancient Greek economic reflection
