La ontología relacional de la responsabilidad. Un comentario a Adscripción y reacción de Sebastián Figueroa

Keywords: responsibility, expectations, liability, recognition, P.F. Strawson, R. Brandom

Abstract

After depicting what Figueroa characterizes as a «interpersonal conception of responsibility», some implications of the distinction between two senses in which the word «expectation» is used are examined, which I take as not sufficiently noticed in his work. This leads, in turn, to a clarification of what may be identified as the possible object of an ascription of responsibility, the determination of which seems insensitive to whether the very notion of responsibility is understood in accordance with such an interpersonal conception. The comment closes with an analysis of the relation that apparently holds between what Figueroa presents as the thesis of the «primacy of liability», on the one hand, and his resort to the concept of «elemental recognition», on the other.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract Views: 177
PDF (Español (España)) : 179

References

Binding, K. (1914). Die Normen und ihre Übertretung (tomo II). Felix Meiner.

Blöser, C. (2014). Zurechnung bei Kant. Walter de Gruyter.

Brandom, R. (1994). Making It Explicit. Harvard University Press.

Brandom, R. (2019). A Spirit of Trust. Harvard University Press.

Figueroa, S. (2019). Adscripción y reacción. Marcial Pons.

Frankfurt, H. (1988). The importance of what we care about. Cambridge University Press.

Hart, H.L.A. (1968). Punishment and Responsibility. Oxford University Press.

Hart, H.L.A. (1994). The Concept of Law. Oxford University Press.

Hohfeld, W.N. (1919). Fundamental Legal Conceptions. Yale University Press.

Luhmann, N. (1987). Rechtssoziologie. Westdeutscher Verlag.

Mañalich, J.P. (2012). El concepto de acción y el lenguaje de la imputación. Doxa 35, 663-690.

Mañalich, J.P. (2019a). Las dimensiones de la culpabilidad jurídico-penal. En M. Maraver y L. Pozuelo (Coords.), La culpabilidad (201-227). BdeF.

Mañalich, J.P. (2019b). Inicio de la tentativa y oportunidad-para-la-acción. Revista Chilena de Derecho, 46 (3), 821-844.

Mellema, G. (2004). The Expectations of Morality. Rodopi.

Nagel, T. (1979). Mortal Questions. Cambridge University Press.

Rivera López, E. (2000). Responsabilidad y suerte moral. Circunstancias y consecuencias de la acción. Análisis Filosófico XX, 33-54.

Rivera López, E. (2016). How to Reject Resultant Luck Alone. The Journal of Value Inquiry, 50, 415-423.

Searle, J. (1979). Expression and Meaning. Cambridge University Press.

Searle, J. (1983). Intentionality. Cambridge University Press.

Strawson, P.F. (2008). Freedom and Resentment and Other Essays. Ed. Routledge.

Vanderveken, D. (2011). Formal semantics for propositional attitudes. Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofia, 34 (1), 323-364.

Published
2022-09-16
How to Cite
Mañalich Raffo, J. P. (2022). La ontología relacional de la responsabilidad. Un comentario a Adscripción y reacción de Sebastián Figueroa. EUNOMÍA. Revista En Cultura De La Legalidad, (23), 467-475. https://doi.org/10.20318/eunomia.2022.7138
Section
Reading Corner. Book Forum