Between Nomos and Physis

The Multiformity of the Sophists’s Speech

  • Francesca Eustacchi Università degli Studi di Macerata
Keywords: nomos, physis, sophists, Socrates, justice, immoralism

Abstract

Sophists deal with the problem of relationship between nomos and physis in terms not only of opposition between, but also of intertwinement. On the one side, the discussion leads to an exaltation of the physis, with opposite effects: in some sophists (Hippias and Antiphon) nature warrants the equality among human beings, while, in other sophists (Callicles and Thrasymachus), nature becomes the basis for legitimizing the dominance of the strongest over the weakest. In this context, the nomos is considered an invention of the weakest to inhibit the strongest. On the other side, we find sophists (like Gorgias) that affirm the need to decide to follow the nomos or the physis on the basis of situation, that is to avoid unilateral positions, or sophists (like Anonymous of Iamblichus) that assume a “conciliatory” perspective between nomos and physis. Socrates completes the variety of this debate. In Criton, Socrates applies a manifold movement to the nomos, divine and human, thus deserving respect and, at the same time, modifiable.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract Views: 1513
PDF : 421

References

Allen, R.E. (1984), The dialogues of Plato, I, New Haven-London.

Allen, R.E. (1998), The dialogues of Plato, III, New Haven-London.

Ciriaci, A. (2011), L’Anonimo di Giamblico, Saggio critico e analisi dei frammenti, Napoli.

Graham, D.W. (2010), The Texts of Early Greek Philosophy, Cambridge.

Kerferd, G.B. (1981), The sophistic movement, Cambridge.

Migliori, M. (ed.) (2000), Il dibattito etico e politico tra il V e il IV secolo, Napoli.

Reale, G. (2000), Il messaggio rivoluzionario della non violenza nel Critone di Platone, in Migliori 2000, 121-135.

Robinson, T.M. (1979), Contrasting Arguments. An edition of the Dissoi Logoi, New York.

Silli, F. (2016), La controversia nomos-physis nei sofisti, in Totaro (2016), 313-321.

Totaro, F. (ed.) (2016), Legge naturale e diritti umani, Brescia.

Waterfield, R. (2000), The First Philosophers, The Presocratics and Sophists, New York.

Published
2022-03-09
How to Cite
Eustacchi, F. (2022). Between Nomos and Physis: The Multiformity of the Sophists’s Speech. ΠΗΓΗ/FONS, 6(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.20318/fons.2021.5502
Section
Articles