Developing a Sense of Justice
Aristotle and John Rawls on Reasoned Respect for the Law and Stable Political Systems
Abstract
In this paper I offer a conceptual characterization of the idea of a “sense of justice” as a suitable motivational basis for respect for the principles of justice in force in a given society, and argue that a similar concern can be found not only in John Rawls, who expressely talks about that notion, but also in Aristotle. My main contention is that both thinkers invite readers to conceive of the sense of justice as an attitude admitting of various degrees, ranging from a fear-inspired respect for the law up to an unconditional appreciation of the established constitutional principles and the laws stemming fom such principles. In the first part of this paper, I will address Aristotle’s view of a natural capacity of human beings for sociability, political participation and functional interdependence within the city culminating in a virtue-based political friendship. In the second part I will contend that, in Rawls’ view, the individual sense of justice is at work not only after the establishment of a public conception of justice (contrary to what a prima facie reading of A Theory of Justice might suggest), but also in a phase ante legem.
Downloads
References
- Aristotle
Accattino, P. (1986), L’anatomia della città nella Politica di Aristotele, Torino.
Besso, G. and Curnis, M. (eds.) (2011), Aristotele. La Politica. Libro I, Roma.
Collins, S.D. (2006), Aristotle and the Rediscovery of Citizenship, Cambridge.
Cooper, J. (1990), «Political Animals and Civic Friendship», in G. Patzig (ed.), Aristoteles Politik: Akten des XI. Symposium Aristotelicum, Göttingen, 221-241.
Crisp, R. (ed. and trans.) (2000), Aristotle. Nicomachean Ethics, Cambridge.
Depew, D.J. (1995), «Humans and Other Political Animals in Aristotle’s History of Animals», Phronesis 40, 2, 156-181.
Garsten, B. (2013), «Deliberating and Acting Together», in M. Deslauriers and P. Destrée (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Aristotle’s Politics, Cambridge, 324-349.
Kullmann, W. (1991), «Man as a Political Animal in Aristotle», in D. Keyt and F.D. Miller Jr (eds.), A Companion to Aristotle’s Politics, Oxford, 94-117.
Lord, C. (ed.) (2013), Aristotle’s Politics, 2nd edn. (first published 1984), Chicago.
Lockwood, T. (2020), «ὁµόνοια: The Hinge of Aristotle’s Ethics and Politics?», Dialogue 59, 1, 7-30.
MacIntyre, A. (1999), Dependent Rational Animals. Why Human Beings need the Virtues, Chicago.
Miller Jr, F.D. (1995), Nature, Justice and Rights in Aristotle’s Politics, Oxford.
Mulgan, R.G. (1974), «Aristotle’s Doctrine that Man is a Political Animal», Hermes 3, 438- 445.
Natali, C. (ed.) (2018), Aristotele. Etica Nicomachea (first published 1999), Roma-Bari.
Newman, W.L. (ed.) (1902), The Politics of Aristotle. Books III, IV and V, III, Oxford.
Regan, R.J. (ed.) (2007), Aquinas. Commentary on Aristotle’s Politics, Indianapolis-Cambridge.
Reeve, C.D.C. (ed.) (2014), Aristotle. Nicomachean Ethics. Indianapolis/Cambridge.
Ross, W.D. (ed.) (1957), Aristotle’s Politica, Oxford.
Rosler, A. (2005), Political Authority and Obligation in Aristotle, Oxford.
Saunders, Th. (ed.) (1995), Aristotle. Politics. Books I and II, Oxford.
Schofield, M. (1999), «Political Friendship and the Ideology of Reciprocity», in his Saving the City. Philosopher-Kings and other Classical Paradigms, London-New York, 72-87.
Schütrumpf, E. (ed.) (1991), Aristoteles. Politik: 1, Berlin.
Simpson, P.L.P. (ed.) (1998), A Philosophical Commentary on the Politics of Aristotle, Chapel Hill-London.
Yack, B. (1993), The Problems of a Political Animal: Community, Justice, and Conflict in Aristotelian Political Thought, Berkeley.
Zingano, M. (2019), «Aristotle on Justice and Punishment: A Reappraisal», in F. Masi, S. Maso, and C. Viano (eds.), Êthikê theôria: studi sull’ Etica Nicomachea in onore di Carlo Natali, Roma, 123-140.
- John Rawls
Baldwin, Th. (2008), «Rawls and Moral Psychology», in R. Schafer-Landau (ed.), Oxford Studies in Metaethics, New York, 247-270.
Freeman, S. (2002), «Congruence and the Good of Justice», in S. Freeman (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Rawls, Cambridge, 277-315.
Greenawalt, K. (1985), «The Natural Duty to Obey the Law», The Michigan Law Review Association 84, 1, 1-62.
Klosko, G. (1994), «Rawls’ Argument for Political Stability», Columbia Law Review 94, 1882-1897.
Kukathas, Ch. (2003), The Liberal Archipelago: A Theory of Diversity and Freedom: Oxford.
Laden, A.S. (2014), «Constructivism as Rhetoric», in J. Mandle and D.A. Reidy (eds.), A Companion to Rawls, Oxford, 59-72.
Mandle, J. (2014), «The Choice from the Original Position», in J. Mandle and D.A. Reidy (eds.), A Companion to Rawls, Oxford, 128-143.
Rawls, J. (1963), «The Sense of Justice», The Philosophical Review, 72, 3, 281-305, Repr. in S. Freeman (ed.) (1999), John Rawls. Collected Papers, Cambridge (MA)-London, 96- 116.
Rawls, J. (1993), Political Liberalism, New York.
Rawls, J. (1999), A Theory of Justice. Revised Edition (first pub. 1971), Cambridge (MA).
Sangiovanni, A. (2015), «Solidarity as Joint Action», Journal of Applied Philosophy 32, 4, 340-359.
Testino, C. (2012), Ragioni Pubbliche e Giustificazione, Genova.
Se permite que los autores de los artículos y de las discusiones publicados en la revista los reproduzcan en otros sitios siempre y cuando se haga mención de que han sido previamente publicados en ΠΗΓΗ/FONS.
