Information sources, trust and public health sector communication on the Covid-19 pandemic
A study on the Italian citizens’ perception
Abstract
Introduction: In the context of infodemic disorder Covid-19 pandemic is a health emergency which also became a communication one. Objectives: The research purpose was to understand how Italians have informed themselves about the pandemic, which sources they have mainly used, and their assessments of public health sector communication at a national and local level. Methodology: The quantitative research consists of a survey conducted through telephone interviews (CATI+CAMI techniques) with a structured questionnaire to a sample of Italians in June and July 2021. Results: On average, watching TV, talking with friends, relatives, or acquaintances, and consulting the Internet are the leading ways of gaining information on the pandemic. Official online sources of information are the most used, followed by institutional websites which played a leading role during the pandemic: regions, the Ministry of Health, and the Presidency of the Council of Ministers. 34% of respondents claim to consult official social media pages or messaging apps of national or local authorities. Conclusions: In the pandemic communication, Italians recognize the crucial role of national and local authorities and online information media systems, but diverse challenges are open for the future of public health sector communication.
Downloads
References
Belardinelli, S., & Gili, G. (2020). Fidarsi. Cinque forme di fiducia alla prova del Covid-19. Mediascapes Journal, (15), 80–98. Retrieved by https://rosa.uniroma1.it/rosa03/mediascapes/article/view/16829
Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., & Grimes, J. M. (2010). Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies. Government information quarterly, 27(3), 264-271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. giq.2010.03.001
Canel, M.-J., & Luoma-aho, V. (2019). Public Sector Communication: Closing Gaps Between Citizens and Public Organizations. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119135630
Catalán-Matamoros, D. (2020). La comunicación sobre la pandemia del COVID-19 en la era digital: manipulación informativa, fake news y redes sociales. Revista Española de Comunicación en Salud, 5-8. https://doi.org/10.20318/recs.2020.5531
Censis. (2014). 48° Rapporto sulla situazione sociale del Paese/2014. Milano, Franco Angeli.
Censis. (2017). 14° Rapporto Censis-Ucsi sulla comunicazione. Milano, Franco Angeli
Censis. (2021). 17° Rapporto Censis sulla comunicazione. Milano, Franco Angeli.
Colombo, F., Boccia Artieri, G., Del Grosso Destrieri, L., Pasquali, F. & Sorice, M. (Eds.). (2012). Media e generazioni nella società italiana. Milano, FrancoAngeli.
Colombo, F. (2022). An ecological approach: The infodemic, pandemic, and COVID-19. In K. KopeckaPiech & B. Łódzki (Eds.), The Covid-19 Pandemic as a Challenge for Media and Communication Studies (pp. 35-48). London, Routledge.
Coombs, W.T. (2019). Transmedia storytelling: A potentially vital resource for CSR communication. Corporate communications: An international journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-11-2017-0114
Coombs, W.T. (2020). Conceptualizing crisis communication. Handbook of risk and crisis communication (pp. 99-118). Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003070726-6
Covello V. (2009). Strategies for overcoming challenges to effective risk communication. In R. L. Heath, H. D. O’Hair (Eds) Handbook of risk and crisis communication (pp. 143-167). New York: Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003070726-9
Chadwick, A. (2013). The Hybrid Media System: Power and Politics. New York, Oxford University Press. Ducci, G. (2017). Relazionalità consapevole. La comunicazione pubblica nella società connessa. Milano, FrancoAngeli.
Ducci, G., Materassi, L., & Solito, L. (2020). ReConnecting Scholars' Voices: An historical Review of Public Communication in Italy and New Challenges in the Open Government Framework. Partecipazione e conflitto, 13(2), 1062-1084. https://doi.org/10.1285/i20356609v13i2p1062
Ducci, G. (2021). Alcuni nodi della comunicazione pubblica digitale di fronte alla pandemia. Le regioni italiane su Facebook durante il lockdown. Mediascapes journal, (18), 141-160. Retrived by https://rosa.uniroma1.it/rosa03/mediascapes/article/view/17673
Ducci, G., & Lovari, A. (2021). The challenges of public sector communication in the face of the pandemic crisis: professional roles, competencies and platformization. Sociologia della comunicazione, 61(2021), 9-19. https://doi.org/10.3280/SC2021- 061002
Edelman, R. (2020). Trust barometer special report: brand trust and the coronavirus pandemic. Global communications firm “Edelman”. Available from: https://www.edelman.com/research/covid-19-brand-trust-report [in English]
Eysenbach, G. (2009). Infodemiology and infoveillance: framework for an emerging set of public health informatics methods to analyze search, communication and publication behavior on the Internet. Journal of medical Internet research, 11(1), e1157. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1157
Faccioli, F., D'Ambrosi, L., Ducci, G., & Lovari, A. (2020). #DistantiMaUniti: la comunicazione pubblica tra innovazioni e fragilità alla ricerca di una ridefinizione. H-ermes. Journal of Communication, 2020(17), 27- 72. https://doi.org/10.1285/i22840753n17p27
Freimuth, V., Linnan, H. W., & Potter, P. (2000). Communicating the threat of emerging infections to the public. Emerging infectious diseases, 6(4), 337– 347. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid0604.000403
Fronte, M. (2022). Medicina Digitale. Focus dossier, 352, Mondadori.
Guidry, J. P., Jin, Y., Orr, C. A., Messner, M., & Meganck, S. (2017). Ebola on Instagram and Twitter: How health organizations address the health crisis in their social media engagement. Public relations review, 43(3), 477-486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. pubrev.2017.04.009
Heath, R. L., & O'Hair, D. (Eds.). (2009). Handbook of risk and crisis communication. New York, NY: Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203891629
ISTAT (2019). Descrizione dei dati demografici dei confini delle unità amministrative a fini statistici. Retrived by https://www.istat.it/it/files//2013/11/2019.28.06-Descrizione-dei-dati.pdf (accessed on 03 June 2022)
ISTAT (2022). Indicatori demografici. Demografia in assestamento. Retrived by https://www.istat.it/it/files/2022/04/Report-Indicatori-Demografici_2021.pdf (accessed on 04 June 2022)
Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture. New York Press, New York. Jenkins, H., Ford, S., & Green, J. (2013). Spreadable media. New York University Press. https://doi.org/10.18574/9780814743515
Kish, L. (1995). Survey Sampling, J. Wiley and Sons Publ., New York.
Leiss, W. (1996). Three phases in the evolution of risk communication practice. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 545(1), 85- 94. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716296545001009
Liu, B. F., & Kim, S. (2011). How organizations framed the 2009 H1N1 pandemic via social and traditional media: Implications for US health communicators. Public relations review, 37(3), 233-244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2011.03.005
Lovari, A., & Bowen, S. A. (2020). Social media in disaster communication: A case study of strategies, barriers, and ethical implications. Journal of Public Affairs, 20(1), e1967. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.1967
Lovari, A., D'Ambrosi, L., & A Bowen, S. (2020). Reconnecting voices. The (new) strategic role of public sector communication after Covid-19 crisis. Partecipazione e conflitto, 13(2), 970-989 http://dx.doi.org/10.1285/i20356609v13i2p970
Lovari, A., Ducci, G., & Righetti, N. (2021). Responding to Fake News: The Use of Facebook for Public Health Communication During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Italy. Communicating COVID-19 (pp. 251-275). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79735-5_13
Lovari, A., Martino, V., & Righetti, N. (2021). Blurred Shots: Investigating the Information Crisis Around Vaccination in Italy. American Behavioral Scientist, 65(2), 351– 370. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764220910245
Lovari, A., & Righetti, N. (2020). La comunicazione pubblica della salute tra infodemia e fake news. Mediascapes journal, (15), 156-173.
Lupton, D. (2016). The Quantified Self: A Sociology of Self-tracking. Polity.
Materassi, L., & Solito, L. (2021). If a picture is not worth a thousand words: digital infographics use during the Covid-19 pandemic crisis. Sociologia della comunicazione, (61), 2021, 52-70. https://doi.org/10.3280/SC2021-061005
Mecatti, F. (2010). Statistica di base. Come, quando e perché. McGraw-Hill.
The Nielsen Company. (2020). COVID-19: Tracking the impact on media and consumer behavior. Retrieved from https://www.nielsen.com/us/en/insights/article/2020/covid-19-tracking-the-impact-on-fmcg-and-retail/ (accessed 03 June 2022)
OECD. (2021). OECD Report on Public Communication: The Global Context and the Way Forward, OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/22f8031c-en
OECD. (2020). Combatting COVID-19 disinformation on online platforms, OECD Policy Responses to Coronavirus (COVID-19), OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/d854ec48-en
Osservatorio News Italia - LaRiCA. (2020), La scienza e il COVID-19. Come si informano gli italiani. Retrieved from: https://newsitaliadotorg.files.wordpress.com/2020/10/fgcult2020.pdf (accessed on 03 June 2022).
Osservatorio News Italia – LaRiCA. (2014). Media digitali, atteggiamenti ed opinioni degli Italiani su un sistema di informazione che cambia. Retrieved from: https://news-italia.it/2014/04/ (accessed on 20 November 2022)
Pan American Health Organisation (PAHO). (2020). Understanding the infodemic and misinformation in the fight against COVID-19. Retrieved from: https://iris.paho.org/bitstream/handle/10665.2/52052/Factsheet-infodemic_eng.pdf (accessed on 20 February 2021)
Pew Research Center. (2020). Trust in medical scientists has grown in U.S. but mainly among Democrats, April 20-26, 2020. Retrieved from: https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2020/05/21/trust-in-medical-scientists-has-grown-in-u-s-but-mainlyamong-democrats/
Prior, M. (2005). News vs. entertainment: How increasing media choice widens gaps in political knowledge and turnout. American Journal of Political Science, 49(3), 577-592.
Reteurs Institute for the Study of Journalism (RISJ). (2020), Digital News Report 2020. Retrived from https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/ files/2020-06/DNR_2020_FINAL.pdf (accessed on 18 November 2022)
Sandman, P. M. (2002). Smallpox vaccination: Some risk communication linchpins. Retrieved from https://www.psandman.com/handouts/sand53.pdf (accessed on 8 June 2022)
Sastry, S., & Lovari, A. (2017). Communicating the ontological narrative of Ebola: An emerging disease in the time of “epidemic 2.0”. Health communication, 32(3), 329-338. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.20 16.1138380
Van De Belt, T. H., Engelen, L. J., Berben, S. A., & Schoonhoven, L. (2010). Definition of Health 2.0 and Medicine 2.0: a systematic review. Journal of medical Internet research, 12(2), e1350. https://doi. org/10.2196/jmir.1350
Villegas-Tripiana, I., Villalba-Diaz, A., & López-Villegas, A. (2020). Análisis de la información sobre COVID-19 en sitios web de organizaciones públicas sanitarias. Revista Española de Comunicación en Salud, 234- 242. https://doi.org/10.20318/recs.2020.5437
Wardle, C. & Derakhshan, H. (2017). Information Disorder: Toward an Interdisciplinary Framework for Research and Policy Making. Council of Europe report, 27, 1-107.
World Health Organisation (WHO). (2010). What is a pandemic? Retrieved from https://www.who.int/csr/disease/swineflu/frequently_asked_questions/ pandemic/en/ (accessed on 20 February 2021)
Zavattaro, S. M., & Sementelli, A. J. (2014). A critical examination of social media adoption in government: Introducing omnipresence. Government Information Quarterly, 31(2), 257-264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. giq.2013.10.007Get
All articles published in this journal –unless otherwise stated- are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerives (CC-BY-ND 3.0 ES) Spain 3.0 License, which allows others to copy, distribute and transmit in a public way as long as they credit the author(s), journal and institution that publish these articles, and provided that they are not altered or modified. The complete license can be consulted in: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/deed/.es
The copyright belongs to the manuscript’s author just on the basis of creating this work:
- Moral rights are undeniable and inalienable.
- Economic or exploitation rights can be transferred to third parties, as it occurs when articles are published and authors partially or totally transfer their exploitation rights to publishers
Authors can archive their own articles in an institutional repository as long as their publications are cited in this journal.
