Preferences, Personality, and Rational Choice in Aristotle and Theophrastus

  • Michael Leese University of New Hampshire
Keywords: Aristotle, Theophrastus, rational choice theory, economic rationality, personality

Abstract

Aristotle outlines a clear theory of human rational choice in his discussions of prohairesis, which is tantalizingly similar to, and even includes, central aspects of economic rationality. His theory then veers off, however, when it gets to one of the major components of modern economically rational choice theory, which are the preferences that guide individuals’ decisions. Unbeholden to disciplinary boundaries of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, he mentions economic rationality only to delve into the variety of personality types and mental programming of the people he observed around him. Desires, emotions, and cultural values influence rational choice of different stereotypes in the Virtues and Vices. Likewise, his student Theophrastus also found the diversity of ancient Greek preferences to be more interesting than the decision-making process itself, particularly how the rational and irrational parts of the brain interact. Aristotle and Theophrastus describe economic rationality but their account of rational choice focuses more on the different personality types, and how emotions and irrational desires intensify, warp, or bypass altogether the rational calculating processes of the brain for some individuals.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract Views: 33
PDF : 18

References

Bjelde, J. (2021), «Xenophon’s Socrates on Wisdom and Action», The Classical Quarterly 71, 2, 560-574.

Chamberlain, Ch. (1984), «The Meaning of Prohairesis in Aristotle’s Ethics», Transactions of the American Philological Association 114, 147-157.

Davidson, J.N. (1998), Courtesans & Fishcakes: The Consuming Passions of Classical Athens, New York.

Diggle, J. (ed.) (2022 [2004]), Theophrastus, Characters, Cambridge.

Donato, M. (2022), Il testo dell’Erissia: storia della tradizione, Baden-Baden.

Eriksson, L. (2005), Economic Man: The Last Man Standing, Göteborg.

Hargreaves Heap, Sh. (1989), Rationality in Economics, New York.

Helmer, É. (2016), «Platon et le désir de richesse: psychologie, économie et politique», in É. Helmer (dir.), Richesse et pauvreté chez les philosophes de l’Antiquité, Paris, 197-220.

Hinsch, M. (2021), Ökonomik und Hauswirtschaft im klassischen Griechenland (“Historia Einzelschriften” 265), Stuttgart.

Jebb, R.C. (1969), The Characters of Theophrastus, London.

Kirchgässner, G. (2008), Homo Oeconomicus: the Economic Model of Behavior and its Applications in Economics and Other Social Sciences, New York.

Konstan, D. (2006), «Epicurean ‘Passions’ and the Good Life», in B. Reis (ed.), The Virtuous Life in Greek Ethics, Cambridge, 194-205.

Liu, W. (2016), «Aristotle on Prohairesis», Labyrinth: an International Journal for Philosophy, Value Theory and Sociocultural Hermeneutics 18, 2, 50-74.

Leese, M. (2017), «Kapêloi and Economic Rationality in Fourth-Century BCE Athens», Illinois Classical Studies 42, 1, 41-59.

Leese, M. (2021), Making Money in Ancient Athens, Ann Arbor.

McCloskey, D.M. (1996), «The Economics of Choice: Neoclassical Supply and Demand», in Th.G. Rawski et alii (eds.), Economics and the Historian, Berkeley, 122-158.

McKirahan, R.D. (20102), Philosophy Before Socrates, Indianapolis.

Millett, P. (1991), Lending and Borrowing in Ancient Athens, Cambridge.

Nielsen, K.M. (2018), «Deliberation and Decision in the Magna Moralia and Eudemian Ethics », in D.O. Brink, S.S. Meyer, Ch.J. Shields (eds.), Virtue, Happiness, Knowledge: Themes from the Work of Gail Fine and Terence Irwin, Oxford, 2018, 197-215.

Nussbaum, M. (1994), The Therapy of Desire, Princeton.

Polanyi, K. (1957), «The Economy as Instituted Process», in K. Polanyi et alii (eds.), Trade and Market in the Early Empires, Chicago, 243-269.

Rapp, Ch. (2006), «What is Aristotle’s Doctrine of the Mean?» in B. Reis (ed.), The Virtuous Life in Greek Ethics , Cambridge, 99-126.

Sen, A.K. (1977), «Rational Fools: a Critique of the Behavioral Foundations of Economic Theory», Philosophy and Public Affairs 6, 4, 317-344.

Sen, A.K. (1997), «Maximization and the Act of Choice», Econometrica 65, 4, 745-779.

Shields, Ch. (2018), «A Series of Goods»,” in D.O. Brink, S.S. Meyer, Ch.J. Shields (eds.), Virtue, Happiness, Knowledge: Themes from the Work of Gail Fine and Terence Irwin, Oxford, 129-148.

Simon, H.A. (1955), «A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice», Quarterly Journal of Economics 69, 99-188.

Simon, H.A. (1992), Economics, Bounded Rationality and the Cognitive Revolution, in Brookfield. Striker, G. (2022), From Aristotle to Cicero , Oxford.

Szaif, J. (2006), «Aristotle on the Benefits of Virtue», in B. Reis (ed.), The Virtuous Life in Greek Ethics, Cambridge, 167-193.

Thompson, E.P. (1971), «The Moral Economy of the English Crowd in the Eighteenth Century», Past & Present 50, 76-136.

Tsouna, V. (2020), «Hedonism», in Ph. Mitsis (ed.), Oxford Handbook of Epicurus and Epicureanism, Oxford, 141-188.

Ussher, R.G. (1960), The Characters of Theophrastus, London.

Von Neumann, J., Morgenstern, O. (2004), Theory of Games and Economic Behavior: 60th Anniversary Commemorative Edition, Princeton.

White, S. (2010), «Stoic Selection, Objects, Actions, and Agents», in A. Nightingale, D. Sedley (eds.), Ancient Models of Mind, Cambridge, 110-129

Published
2024-07-29
How to Cite
Leese, M. (2024). Preferences, Personality, and Rational Choice in Aristotle and Theophrastus . ΠΗΓΗ/FONS, 179-196. https://doi.org/10.20318/fons.2023.8144
Section
Articles